[PATCH] coverage : Add support to run coverage in supported bsp without extra options

[Vijay Kumar Banerjee]

On 15 June 2018 at 08:38, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 14/06/2018 03:12, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> > <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, 21:39 Gedare Bloom, <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> >>> <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 13 June 2018 at 10:29, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee
> >>>>> <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>          bsp = opts.find_arg('--rtems-bsp')
> >>>>>> +        if 'cov' in bsp[1].split('-'):
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm not sure if this use of the 'cov' field in the bsp config
> filename
> >>>>> itself is the proper way to go about accomplishing the activation of
> >>>>> coverage. What are other possible ways to get this done? Is the use
> of
> >>>>> a portion of the bsp config filename done elsewhere in tester?
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch was made following Chris' comments in another thread
> >>>>
> >>>> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2018-June/021931.html
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I can't be sure, but I don't think his intent was to infer the
> >>> coverage from the ini file name.
>
> Correct.
>
> >>> For example, does the tester parse
> >>> the ini file name to check for 'qemu' to decide if that target is
> >>> being used? Instead, it should look in to the config file to read the
> >>> option somehow.
> >>
> >> In leon3-qemu.ini the bsp option inside the
> >> config file is set to leon3-qemu.
> >>
> >> There's no such special thing added to bsp for coverage.
> >> Only difference we have is that,
> >> the option 'bsp_qemu_cov_opts' is added in the coverage supported file.
> we
> >> can
> >> read the config file to see if this option is present.
> >>
> >> Shall I do it this way?
> >
> > Yes, I suspect you should.
> >
>
> Can we have 'coverage = true' in the INI file to indicate this BSP supports
> coverage?
>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +            coverage_enabled = True
>
> And that values maps to here.
>
> As the covoar patches are merged, shall I send a patch with the
coverage=true option ?

> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180626/fe053b2b/attachment-0002.html>