want to contribute to project

Sun Mar 4 11:43:08 UTC 2018

Cillian ,

Thanks for the detailed answers , I will start the reading and will write a
first draft of the proposal in the way you mentioned and Will share the
link here

Thank you,
Vijay k.

On 4 Mar 2018 4:22 p.m., "Cillian O'Donnell" <cpodonnell8 at gmail.com> wrote:

On 3 March 2018 at 22:18, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello sir,
>
> I need some guidance to proceed to apply for #2920 as my GSoC project.
>
> I wanted to know the following points :
>
>  1. What are the prerequisites (do I have to produce something ? like the
> hello world )
>

Other than the hello world, there's no official prerequisites. Usually the
next thing is to fix a small bug, have a look at the tickets here:

https://devel.rtems.org/query

>  2. reference materials (like specific doc), to familiarise with the
> rtems-tester and rsb .
>

Relevant to you would be RTEMS Tester section of the main user manual. The
rest of the manual should be useful for setting up rtems in general.

https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/tools/tester.html

The links to the previous projects which you already found and the other
links I've mentioned.

>  3. how to properly plan the project into phase wise tasks and weekly
> sub-tasks.
>

Essentially it would be:
1. Get coverage analysis running again (converting the config files to .ini
and a couple of fixes to some of the parsing in the sections that haven't
been integrated, might be all that it takes).
2. Then get the coverage tools integrated with RTEMS Tester. Which is fix
the outstanding issues that are mentioned in:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2920
Chris Johns might have things to add to this, ultimately the integration to
RTEMS Tester will be up to him.

The order in which the problems are listed in that ticket are probably the
order in which you would complete them, the stuff about generating the xml
reports and gcov and all of that is probably a 2nd or 3rd phase task for
you depending on how it goes. The plan can change as you go along, its just
important that you make a plan to begin with.

Good luck,

Cillian.

>
> Thank you,
> Vijay k.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1 March 2018 at 15:38, Cillian O'Donnell <cpodonnell8 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 1 March 2018 at 09:10, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> while trying to figure out the starting point, I came across this
>>> project form GSoC 2017 by C.P. O'Donell
>>>
>>> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/archive/2017/projects/49
>>> 25375616385024/
>>>
>>> Is this the project that has previous works on the project I'm wanting
>>> to take (#2920) ? If not , please help me find the right one.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Vijay,
>>
>> Yes that's the one, let me know if you have any questions about it. When
>> I checked last month coverage is not working with the RTEMS Tester because
>> the configuration files for the bsps in rtems-tools/tester/rtems have been
>> converted from .mc to .ini So the old .mc files I mention need to be
>> converted before it will work again.
>>
>> This is what I wrote as the final documentation, it should help you
>> reproduce what I had working last summer.
>>
>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2017/coveragetools
>>
>> Try this branch in github for the starting point:
>>
>> https://github.com/cillianodonnell/rtems-tools/tree/coverage-merge
>>
>> Good luck with the project,
>>
>> Cillian.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Also, please guide me with reading references and some small tickets
>>> related to the project .
>>>
>>> Thank you ,
>>> Vijay k.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 February 2018 at 21:54, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>>> vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you for giving me a detailed introduction to the project
>>>> objectives and mentors.
>>>>  I am interested in # 2920: "Improve Coverage analysis toolkit".
>>>>
>>>> Please guide me with the resources to get started with the project and
>>>> get a deep understanding.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Vijay
>>>>
>>>> On 26 February 2018 at 15:36, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 26, 2018 2:22 AM, "Christian Mauderer" <
>>>>> christian.mauderer at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 24.02.2018 um 16:21 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee:
>>>>> > Hello,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > As told by Joel, I sent the screenshots of my working hello world to
>>>>> his
>>>>> > personal email and have also included my name in the GSoC tracking
>>>>> page .
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > + Make Eclipse Target Interaction work with RTEMS
>>>>> > (https://www.eclipse.org/tcf/)
>>>>> > + Improvements to our coverage reporting. GCOV validation and covoar
>>>>> > reporting improvements
>>>>> > + wifi integration improvements
>>>>> > + aarch64 port
>>>>> > + x86_64 port / non-legacy PC BSP
>>>>> >    - This project is large so we would need to work with whoever
>>>>> wants
>>>>> > to tackle it
>>>>> >      to find the best subset for GSoC.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Based on this list I went through the OpenProjects page
>>>>> > and came across the following Tickets .,
>>>>> > #2920 ,#3222,#2927 and the link to eclipse tcf .
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > out of them , I find these interesting
>>>>> > 1.  "Improve coverage Analysis Toolset " (#2920);
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This area is mine. The ticket mat or may not be a great description of
>>>>> the goals. There are probably three things that need to be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> + Integrate ran recipes for Couverture variant of qemu. This might be
>>>>> a very small task. Last year's student just didn't get this integrated and
>>>>> was waiting for some patches to be merged on their side.
>>>>>
>>>>> + Verify the gcov output from covoar is correct and the gcov (and
>>>>> similar tools) matches the coverage reports it generates. We have someone
>>>>> from the GCC community to help mentor here.
>>>>>
>>>>> + Covoar generates HTML and text output directly. There is a desire
>>>>> for it to generate something equally useful that is processed by existing
>>>>> tools to generate reports. One possible option for this output could be
>>>>> Sphinx like our regular documentation. Or it could be a data-centric format
>>>>> processed by other tools. The current HTML allows filtering and sorting so
>>>>> not losing information and ease of use is important. This probably will end
>>>>> up simplifying C++ and adding Python.
>>>>>
>>>>> > 2.  "libbsd:WiFi support needs rc.conf integration " (#3222)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian's project to mentor.
>>>>>
>>>>> > also I came across # 3302 :" Build system conversion of BSP
>>>>> Config(.cfg)
>>>>> > files to pkg-config(.pc) files"
>>>>> > (I have some knowledge of Python, but not proficient in it, I can
>>>>> learn
>>>>> > it better if it's required )
>>>>> > which I find interesting
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This one is Chris Johns project to mentor. It is an important and
>>>>> logically the next step in replacing our build system with the Python based
>>>>> waf. If you get through this one before the summer is out, then working on
>>>>> waf would probably make sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did I miss one?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello Vijay,
>>>>>
>>>>> all of the projects would be good ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> The #2920 and #3302 are more connected to the host tools. They should
>>>>> be
>>>>> doable with few or no real hardware. But you should ask the two
>>>>> potential mentors about that.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the #3222 you would need some board supported by the libbsd (like
>>>>> Beagle Bone Black) and I would suggest a JTAG debugger (some OpenOCD
>>>>> based or similar).
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Am I following the right tickets? If not please help me find the
>>>>> right ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> The tickets are the right ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Out of these , which one do you recommend me to take ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I would recommend to take a more detailed look at the tickets and start
>>>>> to ask some questions about it on the mailing list with CC to the
>>>>> (potential) mentors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you could also try to find some small tickets related to similar
>>>>> topics and just try to work on these. That could help you find out what
>>>>> you want to do.
>>>>>
>>>>> > My experience with C/C++ : I am proficient in C++11 with STL . Also
>>>>> > proficient in C language .
>>>>> > My experience with opensource : This is the first open source project
>>>>> > I'm taking up .
>>>>>
>>>>> It's no problem if it's your first Open Source project. That's the
>>>>> point
>>>>> of GSoC: To collect first Open Source experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian Mauderer
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thank you ,
>>>>> > Vijay K.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --------------------------------------------
>>>>> embedded brains GmbH
>>>>> Herr Christian Mauderer
>>>>> Dornierstr. 4
>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Dornierstr.+4+%0D+D-82178+Puchheim+%0D+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>> D-82178 Puchheim
>>>>> Germany
>>>>> email: christian.mauderer at embedded-brains.de
>>>>> Phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 18
>>>>> Fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>>>>> PGP: Public key available on request.
>>>>>
>>>>> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>> devel at rtems.org
>>>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel at rtems.org
>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180304/76e5d3b7/attachment-0001.html>