Move libbsp/libchip to top of tree

[Cudmore, Alan P. (GSFC-5820)]

I like the idea, but to me it would be confusing to have bsp and bspkit at the top level, each having nearly the same directories. (but certainly less confusing than before)
At the risk of introducing more work, would it make sense to have bspkit with inc and src subdirectories?

Alan


From: devel <devel-bounces at rtems.org> on behalf of Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org>
Reply-To: "joel at rtems.org" <joel at rtems.org>
Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 3:39 PM
To: "rtems-devel at rtems.org" <devel at rtems.org>
Subject: RFC: Move libbsp/libchip to top of tree

Hi

I thought one of the long term goals was to move libbsp to the top of
the tree as bspkit/. Having source nearer the top of the tree and not
reflecting the historical existence of c/ and ada/ versions of RTEMS
was discussed for waf.

I would think with all the work Sebastian has done, we should consider
doing this now. One of the rationales was to reduce the differences between
the build systems as we switch.

Thoughts?

-joel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180327/1ad8b486/attachment.html>