[PATCH] covoar: fixing the extension mismatch in trace file

Cillian O'Donnell cpodonnell8 at gmail.com
Sun May 13 16:33:48 UTC 2018


On 13 May 2018 at 16:32, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 13 May 2018 at 19:00, Cillian O'Donnell <cpodonnell8 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there supposed to be a message there?
>>
>> Anyway just to clear this up, try this for me.
>>
>> 1. Grab a new branch of
>>
>> https://github.com/cillianodonnell/rtems-tools/tree/tester-support
>>
>> which is the current master plus one patch with the tester support in
>> progress.
>>
>> 2. Apply your patch to that and make no other changes.
>>
>> 3. Build covoar again.
>>
>> 3. Run the tester from the top of the build tree and tell me what you see.
>>
>> cpod at cpod ~/development/rtems/leon3 $ $HOME/development/rtems/test/rtems-tools/tester/rtems-test
>> --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5 --log=coverage-analysis.log
>> --rtems-bsp=leon3-qemu-cov --coverage $HOME/development/rtems/leon3/
>> sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples
>>
>>  Yes it's breaking .
> when used with a single executable say unlimited.exe , it works but when
> it's run with samples/ it returns the error :
> executable build prefix does not match : sparc-rtems5
>

Yeah that's the one I'm seeing. Right so the difference is actually single
or multiple executables. Interesting...

>
> That's strange .
> I think it has something to do with the parsing of the path from the ini
> file.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180513/c4152985/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the devel mailing list