BSPs with Same Name, Different Architecture

[Joel Sherrill]

On Mon, May 14, 2018, 10:16 AM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> This is an excellent rule. BSP names should be unique.
>

I am not sure the current logic ensures that but it did break one of my
name reuses.


> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Just a note that I had used the BSP name deos for three architectures.
> This
> > worked until Chris added the BSP/architecture check.
> >
> > I am ok with the rule thank a bsp name is unique across all architectures
> > but wanted to make sure this was a conscious rule now.
> >
> > --joel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180514/10a2827e/attachment-0002.html>