[PATCH 1/2] covoar/ObjdumpProcessor.cc: Add processing for ... padding notation w/hack

[Joel Sherrill]

On Thu, May 24, 2018, 4:18 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 25/5/18 1:05 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:> Worst case, I could add code to
> the
> target specific code to recognize the
> > previous instruction and get the size. Hmm.. should be a return variant.
> Let me
> > think on that. Can't be that many instructions that make sense as the
> last one
> > it a method.
>
> Would a function with a no return attribute have that sort of instruction
> sequence?
>

Probably not but we have so few of those it wouldn't add many more
instructions.

I will play with this.

>
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180524/aa4b692f/attachment-0002.html>