[POSIX Benchmark Test] psxtmmqrcvblock01 made (GCI 2018)
shashvatjain2002 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 16 16:56:21 UTC 2018
Can someone change the status of the test to YES in the plan.csv file ,as
it has been commited
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:22 PM Shashvat Jain <shashvatjain2002 at gmail.com>
> ok , that makes sense
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:20 PM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>> I agree we want to reduce the overall number of executables but the
>> timing tests which block
>> need a large set of tasks which do precisely the right thing. You have to
>> be very careful not to
>> accidentally measure the overhead of _Thread_Handler or any odd
>> I am happy to see the cases which don't block or unblock merged into
>> single cases. The
>> newly added pthread attr tmtest has a lot of cases. But blocking,
>> unblocking, and preemption
>> cases need to be separate. They are very precise tests and hard to make
>> sure they measure
>> exactly what you think they measure without extras.
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:30 AM Shashvat Jain <shashvatjain2002 at gmail.com>
>>> I asked that before starting to make the test and Dr. Joel asked me to
>>> make a separate one
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:35 PM Sebastian Huber <
>>> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>>> Do we really need separate test programs for all these test cases?
>>>> we just add this to psxtmmq01?
>>>> The reason for this is that it needs time to load a test program to the
>>>> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>>>> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
>>>> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
>>>> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
>>>> E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>>>> PGP : Public key available on request.
>>>> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel