[rtems-test] powerpc/psim: RTEMS_POSIX_API: Passed:560 Failed:14 Timeout:5 Invalid:0 Wrong:0

[Joel Sherrill]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 5:16 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> Hi Joel,
>
> Thank you for running these tests and publishing the results.
>

:) I'm trying to build up my "rtems-cron" script. Not the fanciest way to
decide when to test things but it will know how to test them.

It will eventually run Coverity

Any advice on knowing in a script if git needs to update a repo or a pull
updated? I thought this would work but it didn't show the rtems updates
today:

git rev-list HEAD...origin/master --count


> On 12/4/19 8:10 am, joel at rtems.org wrote:
> > Testing time     : 0:10:37.757133
> > Average test time: 0:00:01.084621
> >
> > Host
> > ====
> > Linux-3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64-x86_64-with-centos-7.5.1804-Core (Linux
> rtbf64c.rtems.com 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 14 21:49:04
> UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64)
> >
> > Configuration
> > =============
> > Version: 5.0.0.ad87de4a67d8ce7e75d0b844efc03b98c3ecda1a
> > Build  : RTEMS_POSIX_API
> > Tools  : 7.4.0 20181206 (RTEMS 5, RSB
> 9a3e12e5820918057633798c3fe2a1f952fb4e56, Newlib 1d35a003f)
> >
> > Summary
> > =======
> >
> > Passed:        560
> > Failed:         14
> > User Input:      6
> > Expected Fail:   0
> > Indeterminate:   0
> > Benchmark:       3
> > Timeout:         5
> > Invalid:         0
> > Wrong Version:   0
> > Wrong Build:     0
> > Wrong Tools:     0
> > ------------------
> > Total:         588
> >
> > Failures:
> >  fsimfsgeneric01.exe
> >  block11.exe
> >  devfs02.exe
> >  rbheap01.exe
> >  termios01.exe
> >  psx12.exe
> >  psxchroot01.exe
> >  psximfs02.exe
> >  psxpipe01.exe
> >  spconfig02.exe
> >  spfatal31.exe
> >  spmountmgr01.exe
> >  spprivenv01.exe
> >  spstdthreads01.exe
> > User Input:
> >  dl10.exe
> >  monitor.exe
> >  termios.exe
> >  top.exe
> >  capture.exe
> >  fileio.exe
> > Benchmark:
> >  whetstone.exe
> >  dhrystone.exe
> >  linpack.exe
> > Timeouts:
> >  fsrfsbitmap01.exe
> >  dl08.exe
> >  dl09.exe
>
> The `dl.*` test timeouts look like the test is running too long and if you
> have
> a number of tests running at once this could be the reason.
>

When run by hand, dl08 passes with this much time used:

real    0m7.194s
user    0m5.997s
sys     0m0.703s

 dl09 is less. Those aren't very long. I don't know why they timeout with
the tester.

fsrfsbitmap01 is over 4.5 minutes of host CPU time and stuck here:

=============
 23. Cleared bit still set: bit = 126

 Testing bitmap_map functions with zero initialized bitmap control pointer

 Allocate most of memory - attempt to fail while open bitmap - expect ENOMEM
=============

I will let it continue overnight but this one is either hung or needs
tweaking to
consume most of memory a single large allocation and then force the the rfs
bitmap error.


> I see a couple of possible solutions, adding timeout control to the tests
> which
> rtems-test can see of I can drop the loop count to 10. The loop count is
> the
> simplest.
>
> The loop lets me see a repeating set of addresses being used so I can
> check for
> leaks.
>

I don't think that's the issue. The dl tests run quickly by hand.

>
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190411/c48942c7/attachment.html>