RISC-V Test Results
Jiri Gaisler
jiri at gaisler.se
Sat Aug 10 19:01:33 UTC 2019
On 8/8/19 3:33 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you are subscribed to the build@ mailing list, then you saw the
> flurry of test
> results from over night. I built every variant and ran the test suite
> with RTEMS
> debug on and off. Here are some observations:
>
> + rv64imafd only has one test pass
> + rv64_iamd_medany only has one test pass
> + Generally speaking, 17-19 tests failed or timed out on every variant
> with
> 551-553 passing. It would be great for someone to mark the tests in
> the
> tcfg files as expected fails.
>
> Hopefully this gives someone incentive to look into the failures.
>
> I would also run them on qemu but I don't think we have an RSB recipe
> for a
> Qemu with RISC-V support.
I don't know about RV64, but most RV32 tests pass on sis using the
griscv bsp:
$ rtems-test --rtems-bsp=riscv-sis riscv-rtems5/c/griscv/testsuites
--log=all.txt
Passed: 633
Failed: 0
User Input: 5
Expected Fail: 0
Indeterminate: 0
Benchmark: 3
Timeout: 2
Invalid: 0
Wrong Version: 0
Wrong Build: 0
Wrong Tools: 0
------------------
Total: 643
User Input:
monitor.exe
termios.exe
top.exe
capture.exe
fileio.exe
Benchmark:
whetstone.exe
dhrystone.exe
linpack.exe
Timeouts:
crypt01.exe
smpmrsp01.exe
Average test time: 0:00:00.354592
Testing time : 0:03:48.002439
The crypt01 would succeed if the timeout limit would be a bit longer.
smpmrsp01 never terminates, this is most likely a simulator issue.
Remaining tests including SMP pass as expected.
Jiri.
>
> --joel
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190810/c26c4de2/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list