Requirements Format

Joel Sherrill joel at rtems.org
Wed Feb 27 15:48:22 UTC 2019


Thanks for the tool tip Jan.

Does this import into Doors? Is there a converter to ReqIF for importing to
other tools?

Would you be willing to submit the scripts and tools you have around it?

Any horrible gotchas?

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 4:59 AM <Jan.Sommer at dlr.de> wrote:

> In one project we use Doorstop (
> https://doorstop.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/items/) due to a lack
> of an actual DOORS license for every partner.
> For software developers it is quite easy to handle as it has a CLI and can
> be easily integrated with git as everything is a text file.
> However, it only gives you the basics. With some scripting we used it to
> generate our Latex-requirements documents with traceability matrices.
>
> Best regards,
>
>    Jan
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: devel [mailto:devel-bounces at rtems.org] Im Auftrag von Sebastian
> > Huber
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2019 08:43
> > An: joel at rtems.org
> > Cc: rtems-devel at rtems.org
> > Betreff: Re: Requirements Format
> >
> > On 26/02/2019 16:15, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:57 AM Sebastian Huber
> > > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> > > <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
> > >
> > >     Hello Joel,
> > >
> > >     On 26/02/2019 15:44, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > >     > Hi
> > >     >
> > >     > I have mentioned this before but reading ticket 3703, you
> obviously
> > >     > didn't remember it.
> > >
> > >     I remember it and I think I proposed to use ReqIF.
> > >
> > >     > ReqIF is an OMG standard for representing
> > >     > requirements in XML format. It was designed to facilitate
> > >     requirements
> > >     > exchange between partnering organizations.
> > >     >
> > >     > https://www.omg.org/spec/ReqIF/About-ReqIF/
> > >     >
> > >     > It appears to be supported by all the major requirement tools
> > >     including
> > >     > DOORS and LDRA's toolset. Importantly, it is supported by the
> > >     Eclipse
> > >     > Requirements Management Framework (RMF) and the ProR tool
> > >     >
> > >     > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Requirements_Modeling_Framework
> > >     > https://www.eclipse.org/rmf/
> > >     > https://www.eclipse.org/rmf/pror/
> > >
> >
> > The ProR and ReqIF Studio look like mostly dead projects to me. They
> > didn't manage to build a reasonable user base and community in the last
> > couple of years. I experienced stability problems with both tools (e.g.
> > NULL pointer exceptions). The documentation is not really great and if
> > you start to try things beyond simple examples it gets hairy. I don't
> > want to work with such tools and waste my time.
> >
> > >     >
> > >     > This is a solved problem. We should not define our own XML
> format.
> > >     > One exists and there is a set of open source tools we can use to
> > >     work
> > >     > with requirements.
> > >
> > >     Did you try to use these tools? It is a nightmare.
> > >
> > >
> > > We were starting to look at some requirements tools for another
> project.
> > > Some of the feedback will be from people with experience with other
> > > requirements tools. My impression is that requirements tools generally
> > > suck.
> > >
> > >
> > >     We evaluated also Papyrus:
> > >
> > >     https://www.eclipse.org/papyrus/
> > >
> >
> > My experience and one of our trainees with Papyrus are not really great.
> > This is a complex tool you have to use intensively in your day to day
> > work to be productive. There are some videos available, but getting
> > started is quite difficult. I guess most people learn it with the help
> > of colleagues. I also guess that it is used via in-house versions and
> > not all known bugs are fixed in the public version. It is overkill just
> > to manage requirements with it.
> >
> > >
> > >     I will try to summarize the problems we encountered using ReqIF in
> > >     the
> > >     next days.
> > >
> > >
> > > The format or the Eclipse tools? The format is separate from the tools.
> >
> > First, we need a data model for the requirements in the scope of RTEMS.
> > You need this model also for ReqIF. ReqIF is the Requirements
> > Interchange Format, the emphasis is on interchange. It is an open
> > question, if it is suitable as a project internal representation for our
> > requirements. At the moment I tend to use some sort of XML file and use
> > a simple text editor.
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
> >
> > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> > Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> > Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> > E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> > PGP     : Public key available on request.
> >
> > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190227/31365c5b/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list