[PATCH] Update User Documentation for host setup for Linux

[Joel Sherrill]

I spotted a spelling error and wondered if you could also update this
section:

https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/hosts/posix.html#archlinux

I assume you figured out how to install pax on Arch/Linux and can pass on
advice
for the next person.

Please tidy those up and it should be OK to merge.

Thanks.

--joel

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:53 AM Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> - mention for the installion of 'pax' package if RTEMS is configured with
> --enable-tests, else build will fail.
> ---
>  user/hosts/posix.rst  | 5 +++++
>  user/tools/tester.rst | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/user/hosts/posix.rst b/user/hosts/posix.rst
> index 063ebe2..ed2cdb5 100644
> --- a/user/hosts/posix.rst
> +++ b/user/hosts/posix.rst
> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ control of the machine. We call this project sandboxing
> and
>  Linux
>  -----
>
> +BSP Build will require ``pax`` package if RTEMS is configured with
> +``--enable-tests`` option, see :ref:`BuildingRTEMSTests`.
> +By default, this package is not installed on many Linux distributions.
> You can check for it using your package manager.
> +Install it, if it is not already present on your system.
> +
>  A number of different Linux distrubutions are known to work. The
> following have
>  been tested and report as working.
>

Distributions is spelled incorrectly.

>
> diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst
> index 09d07ac..967016e 100644
> --- a/user/tools/tester.rst
> +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst
> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ There is the ``erc32`` tester which uses the GDB
> back-end and the
>  how to use :program:`rtems-test` command with the erc32 BSP because it is
> easy
>  to build an use.
>
> +.. _BuildingRTEMSTests:
> +
>  Building RTEMS Tests
>  --------------------
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190222/89b90087/attachment-0002.html>