[PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests
Joel Sherrill
joel at rtems.org
Mon Feb 25 17:52:33 UTC 2019
To follow up, I built lm4f120 with OPERATION_COUNT=10 and the failure set
dropped to these:
gmake[5]: *** [capture.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [loopback.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [block08.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [top.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [sp47.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [sp71.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [sptimecounter02.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [sptimecounter03.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [psxconfig01.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [tm21.exe] Error 1
gmake[5]: *** [tmcontext01.exe] Error 1
--joel
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:39 AM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> The tmtests should fit if the OPERATION_COUNT is lowered for these BSPs.
>
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/tmtests/configure.ac#n27
>
> Right now, this is set on the configure command line. Perhaps the BSP
> needs to provide
> an override if RAM is ilght.
>
> For others, it would be good to know why a test for a specific functional
> area doesn't fit.
> If we are unable to test a core capability on lower memory targets, then
> we should split
> the test or rework it. I'm not worried about dl* on low memory BSPs.
>
> But addressing the OPERATION_COUNT for these BSPs would knock off most of
> the
> list.
>
> Can we find a solution to at least that before this goes in?
>
> --joel
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:33 AM Sebastian Huber <
> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>> ---
>> .../arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg | 79
>> ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg
>> b/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg
>> index c093fa1903..30a16a7535 100644
>> --- a/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg
>> +++ b/bsps/arm/lpc176x/config/lpc1768_mbed-testsuite.tcfg
>> @@ -7,15 +7,80 @@
>> include: testdata/disable-iconv-tests.tcfg
>> include: testdata/disable-jffs2-tests.tcfg
>>
>> +exclude: block08
>> +exclude: capture
>> exclude: dl07
>> +exclude: dl08
>> +exclude: dl09
>> +exclude: fileio
>> exclude: flashdisk01
>> -exclude: ftp01
>> -exclude: utf8proc01
>> -exclude: spstkalloc02
>> exclude: fsdosfsname01
>> +exclude: ftp01
>> exclude: linpack
>> -exclude: pppd
>> +exclude: loopback
>> exclude: mghttpd01
>> -exclude: tmfine01
>> -exclude: iostream
>> -exclude: rtems++
>> +exclude: pppd
>> +exclude: psxaio01
>> +exclude: psxaio02
>> +exclude: psxaio03
>> +exclude: psxconfig01
>> +exclude: psxtmbarrier02
>> +exclude: psxtmclocknanosleep02
>> +exclude: psxtmclocknanosleep03
>> +exclude: psxtmcond08
>> +exclude: psxtmcond09
>> +exclude: psxtmcond10
>> +exclude: psxtmmqrcvblock01
>> +exclude: psxtmmqrcvblock02
>> +exclude: psxtmmutex02
>> +exclude: psxtmmutex04
>> +exclude: psxtmmutex06
>> +exclude: psxtmnanosleep02
>> +exclude: psxtmrwlock02
>> +exclude: psxtmrwlock03
>> +exclude: psxtmrwlock04
>> +exclude: psxtmrwlock05
>> +exclude: psxtmrwlock07
>> +exclude: psxtmsem03
>> +exclude: psxtmsem05
>> +exclude: psxtmsleep02
>> +exclude: psxtmthread01
>> +exclude: psxtmthread03
>> +exclude: sp16
>> +exclude: sp25
>> +exclude: sp42
>> +exclude: sp47
>> +exclude: sp48
>> +exclude: sp71
>> +exclude: spstkalloc02
>> +exclude: sptimecounter02
>> +exclude: sptimecounter03
>> +exclude: tm02
>> +exclude: tm03
>> +exclude: tm04
>> +exclude: tm05
>> +exclude: tm06
>> +exclude: tm07
>> +exclude: tm10
>> +exclude: tm11
>> +exclude: tm12
>> +exclude: tm13
>> +exclude: tm14
>> +exclude: tm15
>> +exclude: tm16
>> +exclude: tm17
>> +exclude: tm18
>> +exclude: tm21
>> +exclude: tm23
>> +exclude: tm24
>> +exclude: tm25
>> +exclude: tm26
>> +exclude: tm29
>> +exclude: tm31
>> +exclude: tm32
>> +exclude: tm33
>> +exclude: tm34
>> +exclude: tm35
>> +exclude: tm36
>> +exclude: tmcontext01
>> +exclude: top
>> --
>> 2.16.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190225/a2a63df1/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list