[PATCH] bsp/lpc1768_mbed: Disable unsupported tests
joel at rtems.org
Mon Feb 25 23:03:38 UTC 2019
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:58 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> On 26/2/19 9:07 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> > <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
> > On 26/2/19 4:52 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > > To follow up, I built lm4f120 with OPERATION_COUNT=10 and the
> failure set
> > > dropped to these:
> > >
> > > gmake: *** [capture.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [loopback.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [block08.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [top.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [sp47.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [sp71.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [sptimecounter02.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [sptimecounter03.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [psxconfig01.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [tm21.exe] Error 1
> > > gmake: *** [tmcontext01.exe] Error 1
> > >
> > This looks better. What does the `OPERATION_COUNT` do to effect the
> link size?
> > It used to do nothing to impact the link size. :)
> > I am wondering how a change to a statically initialised workspace
> > raised and the OPERATION_COUNT interact.
> > OPERATION_COUNT is usually the number of objects (e.g. tasks,
> > etc) created so it is the maximum object count. For example, tm03 has
> > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/tmtests/tm03/system.h#n29
> > |#define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_TASKS (3 + OPERATION_COUNT) |
> > So when Sebastian changed this, it went from a run-time to a link time
> Ah ok, it is nice to see the error on these targets at link time.
> > The intent of OPERATION_COUNT was to be able to scale the timing tests
> > to the hardware platform. Dropping OPERATION_COUNT to 10 for these BSPs
> > will resolve almost all of the tm and psxtm linking issues from what I
> can tell.
> What about a way to set this value in the `.tcfg` files and then provide
> it on
> the command line as a compile option?
This would be awesome! OPERATION_COUNT is an area where our old
build system person didn't want to tread. Much like the entire tcfg system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel