[PATCH 1/2] user: Spell out third-party
joel at rtems.org
Thu Jan 24 02:45:29 UTC 2019
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 7:36 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org wrote:
> On 23/1/19 8:42 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > ---
> > user/exe/executables.rst | 8 ++++----
> > user/hosts/macos.rst | 4 ++--
> > user/hosts/windows.rst | 4 ++--
> > user/installation/releases.rst | 2 +-
> > user/overview/index.rst | 2 +-
> > user/rsb/third-party-packages.rst | 12 ++++++------
> > user/rsb/why-build-from-source.rst | 2 +-
> > user/start/index.rst | 2 +-
> > user/tools/index.rst | 2 +-
> > user/tracing/index.rst | 2 +-
> > 10 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> FYI Joel and I have revisited the definition of 3rd party packages
> deciding what
> we have is not right or clear defined.
> Joel's view which he told me while he was driving and I hope I got correct
> 1. There are packages we develop and maintain, mostly in the RTEMS repo.
> 2. There are packages we have brought in that we maintain, for example
> c11 support, etc. These packages include the ones we build via the RSB. We
> attempt to make sure they build on all BSPs but there can be limits.
> 3. External 3rd party packages, cFS/cFE, EPICS, YAFFS and Qt are all
> This needs to be explained better in the documentation and the excessive
> use of
> third-party needs to be changed.
Third party is something the project does not directly maintain or package.
Libbsd is not third party. The code largely comes from somewhere else but
as a package, it is owned by the project.
It us third party in the same sense as the legal definition of being
independent of the main parties.
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel