[PATCH] Replace build date with Git hash and commit date

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Thu Jan 10 09:25:43 UTC 2019


On 10/1/19 7:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10/01/2019 09:19, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 10/01/2019 00:42, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> On 9/1/19 7:24 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>>> The usage of a build date prevents reproducible builds.
>>> Sorry to revisit this change. I have reviewed the generated the docs and they
>>> look good and the changes are welcome, thank you. I would like to ask a few
>>> questions.
>>>
>>> 1. Can the hash be the short version? I am seeing in the PDF in the page header:
>>>
>>>   Release 5.0.0.05d066a08fe840f6f926bf6d2f3f3c0ebd6cc603 (9th January 2019)
>>>
>>> which is correct but the page header is now 2 lines and a line on a page in the
>>> PDF is precious. In the Classic API manual at 716 pages this is 716 extra lines.
>>> Can we use a shortened hash?
>>
>> I played a bit around view various variants. One problem I had is in case the
>> version line is long but not enough for two lines, then it overlaps the
>> chapter number in the header. If you want a one liner, then the chapter
>> number, the document title and the version must fit into it. I think this is
>> only possible if we drop the date, use a short hash and cut down some document
>> titles (or use a smaller font size). 
> 
> We have to take also the hash-modified modifier into account if you build with a
> non-clean Git checkout.
> 

Yes it should be added to hash. I would not worry about the formatting with this.

Chris



More information about the devel mailing list