[PATCH] Add low level event recording support

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Jan 29 08:52:59 UTC 2019

On 29/1/19 7:40 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 29/01/2019 09:27, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 28/1/19 9:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> how do we want to proceed with this?
>> You have answered my concerns and I am happy with what you are doing and this
>> piece of code.
> Thanks for your review and comments.
>> I look forward to seeing the trace code being moved into libtrace or something
>> like this and seeing it grow as a unified package that make's sense to our users.
> It looks like a good GSoC project.

Excellent idea.

> Should I move the code to cpukit/libtrace/record instead of cpukit/libmisc/record?

Yes you might as well if that is OK with you?

> I am still struggling with the LD --wrap feature:
> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-01/msg00241.html

I am watching. I wish I could help but I do not know the ld code at all.


More information about the devel mailing list