[PATCH v3] ndbm test suite

Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org
Wed Jul 17 18:16:35 UTC 2019


On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:09 AM Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review!
> I will re generate the patch with corrections
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:12 PM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 1:49 AM Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > ---
>> >  testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am      |   7 +
>> >  testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac     |   1 +
>> >  testsuites/psxtests/psxndbm01/init.c | 260 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  3 files changed, 268 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 testsuites/psxtests/psxndbm01/init.c
>> >
>> > diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am b/testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am
>> > index 59c9f2085b..7d1c0a783c 100755
>> > --- a/testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am
>> > +++ b/testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am
>> > @@ -694,6 +694,13 @@ psxmutexattr01_CPPFLAGS = $(AM_CPPFLAGS) $(TEST_FLAGS_psxmutexattr01) \
>> >         $(support_includes) -I$(top_srcdir)/include
>> >  endif
>> >
>> > +if TEST_psxndbm01
>> > +psx_tests += psxndbm01
>> > +psxndbm01_SOURCES = psxndbm01/init.c
>> > +psxndbm01_CPPFLAGS = $(AM_CPPFLAGS) $(TEST_FLAGS_psxndbm01) \
>> > +       $(support_includes)
>> > +endif
>> > +
>> >  if TEST_psxobj01
>> >  psx_tests += psxobj01
>> >  psx_screens += psxobj01/psxobj01.scn
>> > diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac b/testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac
>> > index 85559e4aa5..07d7ccaf55 100644
>> > --- a/testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac
>> > +++ b/testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac
>> > @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ RTEMS_TEST_CHECK([psxmsgq02])
>> >  RTEMS_TEST_CHECK([psxmsgq03])
>> >  RTEMS_TEST_CHECK([psxmsgq04])
>> >  RTEMS_TEST_CHECK([psxmutexattr01])
>> > +RTEMS_TEST_CHECK([psxndbm01])
>> >  RTEMS_TEST_CHECK([psxobj01])
>> >  RTEMS_TEST_CHECK([psxonce01])
>> >  RTEMS_TEST_CHECK([psxpasswd01])
>> > diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxndbm01/init.c b/testsuites/psxtests/psxndbm01/init.c
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 0000000000..b38900361d
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/testsuites/psxtests/psxndbm01/init.c
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
>> > +/**
>> > + *  @file
>> > + *  @brief Test suite for ndbm.h methods
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
>> > + *
>> > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Vaibhav Gupta
>> > + *
>> > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>> > + * are met:
>> > + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>> > + *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> > + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>> > + *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>> > + *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
>> > + *
>> > + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
>> > + * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
>> > + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
>> > + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
>> > + * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
>> > + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
>> > + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
>> > + * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
>> > + * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
>> > + * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
>> > + * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
>> > +#include "config.h"
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > +/* header files are listed in lexical/lexicographical/alphabetical order */
>> > +
>> > +#include <errno.h>
>> > +#include <fcntl.h>      /* contains definitions of `open_flags` */
>> > +#include <limits.h>
>> > +#include <ndbm.h>       /* conatains declarations of ndbm methods */
>> > +#include <stddef.h>
>> > +#include <stdint.h>
>> > +#include <stdio.h>
>> > +#include <sys/stat.h>   /* contains definitions of `file_mode` */
>> > +#include <string.h>
>> > +#include <rtems/test.h>
>> > +#include <tmacros.h>
>> > +
>> > +const char rtems_test_name[] = "PSXNDBM 01";
>> > +
>> > +#define NAME      "VARoDeK"
>> > +#define PHONE_NO  "123-321-777-888"
>> > +#define DB_NAME   "phones_test"
>> > +#define NAME2     "VG"
>> > +#define PHONE_NO2 "321-123-888-777"
>> > +
>> > +/* forward declarations to avoid warnings */
>> > +rtems_task Init(rtems_task_argument ignored);
>> > +
>> > +rtems_task Init(rtems_task_argument ignored)
>> > +{
>> > +  datum name = { NAME , sizeof( NAME ) };
>> > +  datum put_phone_no = { PHONE_NO, sizeof( PHONE_NO ) };
>> > +  datum get_phone_no, key;
>> > +
>> > +  datum name2 = { NAME2 , sizeof( NAME2 ) };
>> > +  datum put_phone_no2 = { PHONE_NO2 , sizeof( PHONE_NO2 ) };
>> > +
>> > +  int i;
>> > +  char *test_strings;
>> > +
>> > +  DBM *db;
>> > +
>> > +  TEST_BEGIN();
>> > +
>> > +/* A Simple test to check if ndbm methods are call-able */
>> > +
>> > +/* Store a simple data
>> > + * This record (procedure) will be helpful in further tests
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Open Database." );
>> > +  db = dbm_open( DB_NAME , O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC , S_IRWXU );
>> Remove the extra blank space character before the comma.
>>
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( db != NULL );
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Store Records in Database." );
>> > +  dbm_store( db , name , put_phone_no , DBM_INSERT );
>> ditto, and more below.
>>
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Fetch Records from Database and check." );
>> > +  get_phone_no = dbm_fetch( db , name );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( strcmp( (const char*)get_phone_no.dptr , PHONE_NO ) == 0 );
>>
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Close Database." );
>> > +  dbm_close( db );
>> > +
>> > +/* dbm_open() */
>> I would like this to be more clearly about documenting what is
>> happening, as it looks from casual glance to be commented-out code one
>> wonders what it does here.
>>
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "\nTestcases for `dbm_open()`" );
>> I would avoid the use of the back-ticks ` characters. Historically,
>> they can cause problems in *nix systems.
>>
>> > +
>> > +/* The `DB_NAME` is already created, hence `O_RDWR | O_EXCL` should fail. */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Use `O_CREAT | O_EXCL` to open existing file and confirm error." );
>> > +  db = dbm_open( DB_NAME , O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL , S_IRWXU );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( db == NULL );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( errno == EEXIST );
>> > +
>> > +/* Some implementations use 3 characters for a suffix and others use
>> > + * 4 characters for a suffix, applications should ensure that the maximum
>> > + * portable pathname length passed to dbm_open() is no greater than
>> > + * {PATH_MAX}-4 bytes, with the last component of the pathname no greater
>> > + * than {NAME_MAX}-4 bytes.
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +/* inside `ndbm.h` ; `#define  DBM_SUFFIX      ".db"` ;
>> > + * 2 alphabtes and 1 period, hence 3 characters are used for suffix
>> typo: alphabets (or alphabetical)
>>
>> > + * in this implementation.
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Use path name larger than `{PATH_MAX}-3 bytes.` and confirm error." );
>> > +  test_strings = (char*)malloc( ( PATH_MAX - 2 ) );
>> the parentheses around PATH_MAX - 2 are redundant
>>
>> > +  for ( i = 0 ; i < ( PATH_MAX - 3 ) ; i++ ){
>> space before {.
>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coding/Conventions#Formatting
>>
>> > +    test_strings[i] = 'r';
>> > +  }
>> > +  test_strings[i] = '\0';
>> > +  db = dbm_open( (const char*)test_strings , O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC , S_IRWXU );
>> This line is > 80 characters. Please break it apart as per
>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coding/80_characters_per_line
>>
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( db == NULL );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( errno == ENAMETOOLONG );
>> > +  free( test_strings );
>> > +
>> > +/* database opened for write-only access opens the files for read and
>> > + * write access or it will fail.
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +/* Implemenation of __hash_open in newlib does not support `O_WRONLY` */
>> typo: Implementation
>>
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Open file with write access only and confirm error." );
>> > +  db = dbm_open( DB_NAME , O_WRONLY , S_IRWXU );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( db == NULL );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( errno == EINVAL );
>> > +
>> > +/* dbm_store() */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "\nTestcases for `dbm_store()`" );
>> > +  db = dbm_open( DB_NAME , O_RDWR , S_IRWXU );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( db != NULL );
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Insert new record with same key using `DBM_INSERT` mode and confirm error." );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( dbm_store( db , name , put_phone_no2 , DBM_INSERT ) == 1 );
>> also too long. fix all lines > 80 characters
>>
>> > +  get_phone_no = dbm_fetch( db , name );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( strcmp( (const char*)get_phone_no.dptr , PHONE_NO ) == 0 );
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Insert new record with same key using `DBM_REPLACE` mode and confirm changes." );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( dbm_store( db , name , put_phone_no2 , DBM_REPLACE ) == 0 );
>> > +  get_phone_no = dbm_fetch( db , name );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( strcmp( (const char*)get_phone_no.dptr , PHONE_NO2 ) == 0 );
>> > +
>> > +/* Revert for next tests*/
>> > +
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( dbm_store( db , name , put_phone_no , DBM_REPLACE ) == 0 );
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Store a new record and confirm, total number of records is successful 2." );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( dbm_store( db , name2 , put_phone_no2 , DBM_INSERT ) == 0 );
>> > +  for(key = dbm_firstkey( db ) , i = 0; key.dptr != NULL; key = dbm_nextkey( db ) , i++ );
>> add spaces around ( after for:
>>
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( i == 2);
>> spacing
>>
>> > +  dbm_close( db );
>> > +
>> > +/* dbm_fetch() */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "\nTestcases for `dbm_fetch()`" );
>> > +  db = dbm_open( DB_NAME , O_RDONLY , S_IRWXU );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( db != NULL );
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Fetch existing records and confirm results." );
>> > +  get_phone_no = dbm_fetch( db , name );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( strcmp( (const char*)get_phone_no.dptr , PHONE_NO ) == 0 );
>> > +  get_phone_no = dbm_fetch( db , name2 );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( strcmp( (const char*)get_phone_no.dptr , PHONE_NO2 ) == 0 );
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Fetch non-existing record and conform error." );
>> typo: confirm
>>
>> > +  test_strings = (char*)malloc(6);
>> > +  strcpy( test_strings , "Hello" );
>> suggest you use strncpy.
>>
>> > +  key.dptr = test_strings;
>> > +  key.dsize = sizeof( test_strings );
>> > +  get_phone_no = dbm_fetch( db , key );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( get_phone_no.dptr == NULL );
>> > +  dbm_close( db );
>> > +
>> > +/* dbm_delete() */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "\nTestcases for `dbm_delete()`" );
>> > +  db = dbm_open( DB_NAME , O_RDWR , S_IRWXU );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( db != NULL );
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Delte non-existing record and confirm error." );
>> typo: Delete
>>
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( dbm_delete( db , key ) != 0 );
>> > +  free( test_strings );
>> > +  for(key = dbm_firstkey( db ) , i = 0; key.dptr != NULL; key = dbm_nextkey( db ) , i++ );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( i == 2);
>> since you are repeating this logic many times, you might consider
>> writing a helper function to count the records in the db. It will make
>> the test easier to read too.
>
> Sure, I must confirm for this from Newlib first. Or else I can make
> a user-defined function in a tesuite itself for this purpose.
> .
> It will take database name as an argument and count number of
> records.
This has nothing to  do with newlib. It is about how to write good
code.  You should define top of this file something like

static int count_records( DBM *db )
{
  int i = 0;
  ...
  return i;
}

>>
>> > +
>> > +  puts("Delete existing record and confirm, total number of records is successful 1.");
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( dbm_delete( db , name ) == 0 );
>> > +  for(key = dbm_firstkey( db ) , i = 0; key.dptr != NULL; key = dbm_nextkey( db ) , i++ );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( i == 1);
>> > +
>> > +  puts("Confirm if correct record is deleted.");
>> > +  get_phone_no = dbm_fetch( db , name );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( get_phone_no.dptr == NULL );
>> > +
>> > +/* record returned by `dbm_firstkey()` should be the only record
>> > + * left, this should be checked to confirm correct working of
>> > + * `dbm_firstkey()`.
>> > + * Check if the data is not corrupted after usage of `dbm_delete()`
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Check if the data is not corrupted after usage of `dbm_delete()`." );
>> > +  get_phone_no = dbm_fetch( db , dbm_firstkey( db ) );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( strcmp( (const char*)get_phone_no.dptr , PHONE_NO2 ) == 0 );
>> > +
>> > +/* Empty the database and then try to use `dbm_firstkey()`, the
>> > + * dptr pointer should point to NULL.
>> > + */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "Empty records in database and check results of `dbm_firstkey()`." );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( dbm_delete( db , dbm_firstkey( db ) ) == 0 );
>> > +  key = dbm_firstkey( db );
>> > +  rtems_test_assert( key.dptr == NULL );
>> > +  dbm_close( db );
>> > +
>> > +/* `dbm_firstkey()` */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "\nTestcases for `dbm_firstkey()`" );
>> > +  puts( "All cases tested while performing above tests." );
>> > +
>> > +/* `dbm_nextkey()` */
>> > +
>> > +  puts( "\nTestcases for `dbm_nextkey()`" );
>> > +  puts( "All cases tested while performing above tests." );
>> > +
>> these are not necessary print statements then. you can just make it a
>> comment somewhere in here that those functions are tested already.
>>
>> > +  TEST_END();
>> > +  rtems_test_exit(0);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +/* NOTICE: the clock driver is explicitly disabled */
>> > +
>> > +#define CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_DOES_NOT_NEED_CLOCK_DRIVER
>> > +#define CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_NEEDS_CONSOLE_DRIVER
>> > +
>> > +#define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_TASKS                  1
>> > +
>> > +#define CONFIGURE_LIBIO_MAXIMUM_FILE_DESCRIPTORS 6
>> > +
>> > +#define CONFIGURE_RTEMS_INIT_TASKS_TABLE
>> > +
>> > +#define CONFIGURE_INITIAL_EXTENSIONS RTEMS_TEST_INITIAL_EXTENSION
>> > +
>> > +#define CONFIGURE_INIT
>> > +#include <rtems/confdefs.h>
>> > +/* end of file */
>> > --
>> > 2.21.0
>> >


More information about the devel mailing list