Patch review process
gedare at rtems.org
Tue Jul 30 15:54:27 UTC 2019
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:01 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 23:40, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:25 AM Sebastian Huber
> > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> Joel asked me to document the normal patch review process. Should this
> >> be in a "Contributing" chapter in the user manual or should this stuff
> >> be in the RTEMS Software Engineering manual?
> > I suggest we try to document all our processes in the eng manual, and
> > provide just brief descriptions and pointers elsewhere as needed.
> I am a bit undecided. Contirbuting patches to RTEMS should be a low
> threshold operation. I will try to add a simple "Contributing" chapter
> to the user manual and add the details to the eng manual.
Yes, this is sensible. A "simplified" description in the user manual
should go with the detailed processes in the eng manual.
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP : Public key available on request.
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel