Patch review process

[Gedare Bloom]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:01 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> On 29/07/2019 23:40, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:25 AM Sebastian Huber
> > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>  wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Joel asked me to document the normal patch review process. Should this
> >> be in a "Contributing" chapter in the user manual or should this stuff
> >> be in the RTEMS Software Engineering manual?
> >>
> > I suggest we try to document all our processes in the eng manual, and
> > provide just brief descriptions and pointers elsewhere as needed.
>
> I am a bit undecided. Contirbuting patches to RTEMS should be a low
> threshold operation. I will try to add a simple "Contributing" chapter
> to the user manual and add the details to the eng manual.
>
Yes, this is sensible. A "simplified" description in the user manual
should go with the detailed processes in the eng manual.

>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.