Query GSoC 2019 | Improve Coverity scan integration #3712

[Joel Sherrill]

We also had some offlist emails.

Ravindra.. did you get a consistent view? Can you provide a follow up on
what we all suggested?

I want to make sure we gave you a common view of the problem space and
possible things to
do this summer.

I will repeat that I mentioned taking a broad view of static analysis
including other tools
like SonarQube (https://www.sonarqube.org/). And that some of the issues
are not
solvable -- Coverity has a limit on the number of runs a day and requires a
login to
view the reports. Perhaps an organizational daily run which is scheduled to
always
be first from Coverity's viewpoint and a way to export reports from Scan
and then
import them to Trac would improve things.

Overall, there is room for creativity and improvement in our support and
process of
using these tools.

--joel

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:47 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> Hello Gedare,
>
> On 07/03/2019 15:35, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > P.S. you should also address the questions posed by Sebastian in his
> > response to your query about Trace Compass.
>
> Ravindra Kumar Meena answered by PM. This is fine.
>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190308/ca8a27f2/attachment-0002.html>