[rtems-test] sparc/erc32: RTEMS_NETWORKING, RTEMS_POSIX_API: Passed:583 Failed:1 Timeout:1 Invalid:0 Wrong:0

[Joel Sherrill]

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019, 11:01 AM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 10/3/19 2:18 am, joel at rtems.org wrote:
> > Testing time     : 0:03:48.073542
> > Average test time: 0:00:00.384610
> >
> > Host
> > ====
> > Linux-3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64-x86_64-with-centos-7.5.1804-Core (Linux
> rtbf64c.rtems.com 3.10.0-862.11.6.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 14 21:49:04
> UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64)
> >
> > Configuration
> > =============
> > Version: 5.0.0.08ef50ff6a3b712cef5bcdeb78c531bc6a3e0f9e
> > Build  : RTEMS_NETWORKING,RTEMS_POSIX_API
> > Tools  : 7.4.0 20181206 (RTEMS 5, RSB
> 38241392a4f96dabf2d1aba51a43dcb623db4dfb, Newlib 1d35a003f)
> >
> > Summary
> > =======
> >
> > Passed:        583
> > Failed:          1
> > User Input:      5
> > Expected Fail:   0
> > Indeterminate:   0
> > Benchmark:       3
> > Timeout:         1
> > Invalid:         0
> > Wrong Version:   0
> > Wrong Build:     0
> > Wrong Tools:     0
> > ------------------
> > Total:         593
> >
> > Failures:
> >  dl09.exe
>
> This test needs a lot of memory to run. It loads modules 64K apart to test
> the
> trampolines. I think there is an option to increase the memory of this
> simulator
>  but I am not sure.
>
> I am wondering if we need a file called 'disable -large-memory-tests.tcfg'
> with
> dl09.exe excluded.
>

Some of the tests are known to be deliberate memory pigs. This would be
good. Commonly excluded tests would be obvious candidates.

I need to investigate the impact of enabling debug and profiling on the
failures. All built for me without those enabled.

>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190309/d71b7e8d/attachment-0002.html>