[PATCH] record: Add wrappers for malloc() functions

Sebastian Huber sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Mon Sep 2 07:11:54 UTC 2019

On 02/09/2019 09:00, Chris Johns wrote:
> Why not generate the call to `rtems_record_produce_2`? You should be able to
> determine this give you will know there in a single item plus the return address
> to record. In fact there is little need for `rtems_record_produce_n` if you have
> [1..n] already defined.

The rtems_record_produce_2() is just an optimization since most 
architectures accept up to four arguments via registers. The particular 
rtems_record_produce*() function is not the issue here.

Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.

More information about the devel mailing list