Test for clock_nanosleep with CLOCK_MONOTONIC (# 3890)

[Sebastian Huber]

On 09/04/2020 14:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 7:28 AM Utkarsh Rai <utkarsh.rai60 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:utkarsh.rai60 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>     I am willing to add tests for clock_nanosleep with
>     CLOCK_MONOTONIC. What is the standard way of adding test for an
>     already present  API but with different configuration? For eg.
>     should I add 'psxtmclocknanosleep04/ 05/ 06' in the testsuite?
>
>
> Yes. That is the pattern.
We should try to reduce the count of test programs since on boards with 
a long reboot time, more tests programs means much more test time 
(compared to the new test cases alone).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200409/abcbe038/attachment.html>