[PATCH v2] Test for clock_nanosleep with CLOCK_MONOTONIC option.

[Utkarsh Rai]

Oh, I missed that, basically the difference between the second would amount
to 59 and hence my assumption would be wrong
Thank you for the clarification, I will remember to consider the cases.

On Wed 15 Apr, 2020, 7:37 PM Gedare Bloom, <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> I appreciate what Sebastian is doing, but I'll be a bit more explicit.
> You should understand what resources/APIs already exist that may help
> you, such as:
> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user/timespec_helpers.html#timespec-helpers
>
> What happens when the time is 11:59:59.999999999 (HH:MM:SS.mmmuuunnn)
> and you delay for 1 ns?
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:00 AM Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> >
> > On 15/04/2020 15:55, Utkarsh Rai wrote:
> >
> > Yes sir.
> >
> > Ok, good, then you should do this. Maybe someone else solved this
> problem already.
> >
> >
> > On Wed 15 Apr, 2020, 7:21 PM Sebastian Huber, <
> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 15/04/2020 15:00, Utkarsh Rai wrote:
> >>
> >> > Okay, so from what I could gather the time between the two gettime
> >> > calls can exceed 1 sec if it is preempted by another process in
> >> > between. Is my line of thought correct?
> >> There is no other process. What you want to know is if the difference
> >> between two struct timespec is greater than or equal to 1ns, right?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200415/f02b0a3f/attachment-0001.html>