Report on failing tests with thread stack protection and their resolution.

[Utkarsh Rai]

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 8:23 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 03/12/2020 01:53, Utkarsh Rai wrote:
> > +rtems_status_code _Memory_protection_Disable( void )
> > +{
> > +  uint32_t access_flags;
> > +
> > +  access_flags = translate_flags(  RTEMS_READ_WRITE );
> > +
> > +  _Thread_Iterate( set_memory_flags, &access_flags );
> > +
> > +  return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> >  }
> using _Thread_Iterate() for this is quite bad in terms of performance
> and it may also lead to unpredictable behaviour.
>

Yes,  this is wrong. Simply disabling the protection for just 'the_thread'
should be sufficient in our case.


>
> --
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20201218/4ebd95b9/attachment.html>