Ticket #3515

Bran S archsbran at gmail.com
Thu Feb 6 14:22:20 UTC 2020


On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 13:28, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020, 11:33 AM Bran S <archsbran at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 1 February 2020, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 9:31 PM Bran S <archsbran at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 18:44, Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
>> vijaykumar9597 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 12:57 PM Bran S <archsbran at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 05:52, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 29/1/20 7:03 pm, Bran S wrote:
>> >> >> > > Hi Guys,
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I am trying to solve #3515
>> >> >> > > https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3515 <
>> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3515>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Nice and thanks.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > For this issue covoar is required.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > So I cloned https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/ <
>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/>
>> >> >> > > This is my directory structure:
>> >> >> > > $HOME/quick-start/src/rtems - Main RTEMS repo
>> >> >> > > $HOME/quick-start/src/rsb - Source Builder
>> >> >> > > $HOME/quick-start/src/rtems-tools - The one that I have
>> recently cloned
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > But running `rtems-test --list-bsps` inside
>> '$HOME/quick-start/src/rtems-tools'
>> >> >> > > gives "error: RTEMS Toolkit python wrapper not found, plrease
>> report"
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Any ideas on how to resolve this error ?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > What does `type rtems-test` say?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Have you built a set of sparc tools?
>> >> >> > Have you build the leon3 BSP and all the tests?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I am not sure what happens if the `rtems-test` is run in the
>> source tree while
>> >> >> > picking up a version from your path. Maybe `./tester/rtems-test
>> ...` works?
>> >> >>
>> >> > Hi Bran,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for taking up this ticket.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It is now working my $PATH was wrongly set with rtems/4.11 instead
>> of rtems/5.
>> >> >> I have corrected it. It now contains '$HOME/quick-start/rtems/5/bin'
>> >> >>
>> >> > Nice.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Moving on to the next problem:
>> >> >>
>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GCI/Documentation/CoverageAnalysis/Coverage#RunningRTEMS-TESTERforCoverageanalysis
>> >> >> I was reading this to know more about covoar.
>> >> >> So as mentioned above I ran
>> >> >>
>> >> >> `rtems-test --rtems-tools=/home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/
>> >> >> --log=coverage_analysis.log --no-clean --coverage=score
>> >> >> --rtems-bsp=leon3-qemu-cov
>> >> >>
>> /home/user45/quick-start/build/b-leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/hello.exe`
>> >> >>
>> >> >> And the output was: https://paste.debian.net/1128608/
>> >> >> `qemu-system-sparc` not being installed seems to be the cause for
>> the error.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So I followed suggestion found here:
>> >> >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/2018-January/065583.html
>> >> >> Ran the commands as:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> $ cd /quick-start/src/rsb/rtems/
>> >> >> The rsb directory contains rtems source builder.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> $ ../source-builder/sb-set-builder
>> --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/5
>> >> >> devel/qemu.bset
>> >> >>
>> >> > You need devel/qemu-couverture.bset but while trying to build it, I
>> see the same error
>> >> > as you see with qemu.bset
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Running this further gives errors and reports it into
>> >> >> 'rsb-report-glib-2.39.3-x86_64-linux-gnu-1.txt'
>> >> >> Full output of above command is at:
>> https://paste.debian.net/1128609/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The content of 'rsb-report-glib-2.39.3-x86_64-linux-gnu-1.txt' is
>> >> >> here: https://paste.debian.net/1128610/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In file 'rsb-report-glib-2.39.3-x86_64-linux-gnu-1.txt' (at
>> >> >> https://paste.debian.net/1128610/) the first error occurs at line
>> 385,
>> >> >> which is:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ../../glib-2.39.3/glib/gdate.c:2497:7: error: format not a string
>> >> >> literal, format string not checked [-Werror=format-nonliteral]
>> >> >>        tmplen = strftime (tmpbuf, tmpbufsize, locale_format, &tm);
>> >> >>        ^~~~~~
>> >> >>   CC       libglib_2_0_la-gdir.lo
>> >> >>   CC       libglib_2_0_la-genviron.lo
>> >> >> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>> >> >> Makefile:1782: recipe for target 'libglib_2_0_la-gdate.lo' failed
>> >> >> make[4]: *** [libglib_2_0_la-gdate.lo] Error 1
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This happens to be a known error/bug (Ref:
>> >> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95326)
>> >> >> and a patch is available for it here:
>> >> >>
>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/commit/8cdbc7fb2c8c876902e457abe46ee18a0b134486
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Following the patch I manually made changes into
>> >> >>
>> '$HOME/quick-start/src/rsb/rtems/build/glib-2.39.3-x86_64-linux-gnu-1/glib-2.39.3/glib/gdate.c'
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But the problem is that as soon as I run
>> >> >> `../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/5
>> >> >> devel/qemu.bset`
>> >> >> My manual changes to the gdate.c disappear and I get the same error
>> as
>> >> >> before. I don't know what is going on.
>> >> >>
>> >> > I applied the patch that you found along with another patch and
>> built the souces, glib built
>> >> > successfully, but unfortunately the couverture-qemu itself failed to
>> build. Here's the log:
>> >> > https://paste.ofcode.org/KmJCNZrJyQNev6R4FSUafe
>> >> >
>> >> > Here I'm pasting the diff to add patches to RSB:
>> >> > ```
>> >> > diff --git a/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg
>> b/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg
>> >> > index d86fe28..0bada15 100644
>> >> > --- a/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg
>> >> > +++ b/bare/config/devel/glib-2.39.3-1.cfg
>> >> > @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@
>> >> >
>> >> >  %hash sha256 glib-%{glib_version}.tar.xz
>> d9fa6c9aa645a5e688a3bb29013bb83801b19ee767d99e33ff52e004e1cc5fc8
>> >> >
>> >> > +#Patch to supress string literal warning
>> >> > +
>> >> > +%patch add glib
>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/commit/0817af40e8c74c721c30f6ef482b1f53d12044c7.patch
>> >> > +%patch add glib
>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/commit/566e1d61a500267c7849ad0b2552feec9c9a29a6.patch
>> >> >  #
>> >> >  # The GLib build instructions. We use 2.x.x Release 1.
>> >> >  #
>> >> > ```
>> >> >
>> >> > You can apply the above diff into your rtems-source-builder and try
>> to build couverture qemu.
>> >> > Most likely it will fail it seems.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> After this I found out that `qemu4.bset` is also present so I ran
>> >> >> $ ../source-builder/sb-set-builder
>> --prefix=$HOME/quick-start/rtems/5
>> >> >> devel/qemu4.bset
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It seems to have run successfully here is the full output:
>> >> >> https://paste.debian.net/1128611/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Seems like qemu-system-sparc is now installed. But still while
>> running
>> >> >>
>> >> >> `rtems-test --rtems-tools=/home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/
>> >> >> --log=coverage_analysis.log --no-clean --coverage=score
>> >> >> --rtems-bsp=leon3-qemu-cov
>> >> >>
>> /home/user45/quick-start/build/b-leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/samples/hello.exe`
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I get the same error related to qemu-system-sparc.
>> >> >> Here is the full output: https://paste.debian.net/1128612/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But this time there is a little difference.
>> >> >> Earlier it exited with exit code 2. see (
>> https://paste.debian.net/1128608/)
>> >> >> Now it is exiting with exit code 1. see (
>> https://paste.debian.net/1128612/)
>> >> >> Note: To see the exit code on the above 2 links you may have to use
>> >> >> the horizontal scroll.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What am I doing wrong ? Please suggest a way to solve this. I am
>> just
>> >> >> trying to run a simple rtems-test coverage.
>> >> >
>> >> > For now, I suggest you to use --rtems-bsp=leon3-sis-cov instead of
>> qemu,
>> >> > this is give you the reports and you can start focusing on your main
>> ticket.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the suggestion, leon3-sis-cov works, with a minor error as:
>> >>
>> >> error: copying tree (4):
>> >> /home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/covoar/covoar.css
>> >> -> /home/user45/quick-start/leon3-sis-coverage/score: [Errno 2] No
>> >> such file or directory:
>> >> '/home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/covoar/covoar.css'
>> >>
>> > This was fixed a few days ago. Please update to the current HEAD of
>> rtems-tools and
>> > do a `./waf clean build install`
>> >>
>> >> But the leon3-sis-report.html gives the coverage report. I am still
>> >> studying the leon3-sis-coverage directory.
>> >>
>> > Great!
>> > After updating the rtems-tools, go for a full samples directory run.
>> > (just replace the /path/to/samples/hello.exe in your command with
>> /path/to/samples/ )
>> >
>>
>>
>> I am trying to understand ticket #3515
>> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3515
>>
>> So I ran the below commands.
>>
>> $ rtems-test --rtems-tools=/home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/
>> --log=coverage_analysis.log --no-clean --coverage=score
>> --rtems-bsp=leon3-sis-cov
>> /home/user45/quick-start/build/b-leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/fstests/fsclose01.exe
>>
>
> The command is correct but it's running coverage for "score" only.
>
> The --coverage option, if added without any argument, will run the
> coverage analysis of the exe for all the subsystems (like score, posix,
> rtems etc.)
>
> From the ticket: It looks like covoar is failing for fsclose01.exe under
> posix.
> To test that, you can either just add --coverage option without any
> argument and wait for it to fail in posix, or you can just add
> --coverage=posix since we just want to check posix.
>
>>
>> $ /home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/bin/covoar -vvvv -S
>> /home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/leon3-sis-symbols.ini
>> -O leon3-sis-coverage -E
>> /home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/Explanations.txt
>> -p RTEMS-5
>> /home/user45/quick-start/build/b-leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/fstests/fsclose01.exe
>>
>> The Output is at: https://gofile.io/?c=xQKwul
>>
>> #3515 says that the covoar fails for fstests/fsclose01.exe
>> Although I do not understand the output entirely but it looks as if
>> covoar on fstests/fsclose01.exe did not fail because when I run covoar on
>> samples/hello.exe the output is similar.
>>
>> The content of leon3-sis-coverage/ExplanationsNotFound.txt:
>> coremsg.c:86
>> schedulerpriorityyield.c:47
>> schedulerpriorityyield.c:51
>> schedulerpriorityyield.c:52
>>
>> The strange part is line 86 in
>> quick-start/src/rtems/cpukit/score/src/coremsg.c is a comment.
>>
>> And there is no line 47,51,52 in
>> quick-start/src/rtems/cpukit/score/src/schedulerpriorityyield.c
>>
>> Do these numbers not represent line numbers ? If not, what do they
>> represent ?
>>
> The do represent line numbers and it looks like you found some
> discrepancy. I would suggest you to try some other combinations of exe and
> subsystems to see if you find any pattern. This will help you understand if
> it's only with these exes or is this a problem in general.
>


Command:
$ /home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/bin/covoar -vvvv -S
/home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/leon3-sis-symbols.ini
-O leon3-sis-coverage -E
/home/user45/quick-start/rtems/5/share/rtems/tester/rtems/testing/coverage/Explanations.txt
-p RTEMS-5
/home/user45/quick-start/build/b-leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/fstests/fsclose01.exe

Output:
...
error: ExecutableInfo::findCoverageMap: wait

Found findCoverageMap in
/home/user45/quick-start/src/rtems-tools/tester/covoar/ExecutableInfo.cc:124
If I want to make some changes into the file, how to make those changes, to
take effect ?
I should mention that the covoar binary used in the command above was not
created via rtems-tools repository directly. It was built according to the
instructions in the quick-start guide.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200206/68b56311/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the devel mailing list