[PATCH 18/18] config: Add <rtems/confdefs/obsolete.h>

[Sebastian Huber]

On 15/02/2020 05:22, Gedare Bloom wrote:

> This makes sense. Is there any reason for the ordering?
It should be alphabetically sorted.
>
> If possible, I think grouping by obsoleted version or alphabetical 
> ordering would be a good idea.

Maybe I should add a comment like this to the top of the list:

/*
  * Please keep the list of obsolete configuration options 
alphabetically sorted.
  *
  * Use #warning for renamed options and define the new option accordingly.
  *
  * Use #warning for obsolete options which are now superfluous, e.g. 
because
  * the objects are now self-contained.
  *
  * Use #error for options which require now a different configuration 
approach,
  * e.g. options for an own configuration table.
  */