Need help to execute/debug smpschededf02.exe on leon3
Richi Dubey
richidubey at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 08:32:15 UTC 2020
Yeah, this makes a lot of sense.
Mr. Huber also told me a similar story about qemu using -O0 optimizations
which are easier to debug.
Thank you.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:03 PM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:32 AM Richi Dubey <richidubey at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Dr. Gaisler,
> >
> > There's something that I am getting stuck at while trying to debug an
> smp03 (https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/smptests/smp03/init.c)
> test suite with gdb running on sis.
> >
> > I started sis with the command:
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > $ ./sparc-rtems5-sis -leon3 -m 4 -gdb
> >
> > SIS - SPARC/RISCV instruction simulator 2.21, copyright Jiri Gaisler
> 2019
> > Bug-reports to jiri at gaisler.se
> >
> > LEON3 emulation enabled, 4 cpus online, delta 50 clocks
> >
> > gdb: listening on port 1234
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > and gdb with the command:
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > $ ./sparc-rtems5-gdb
> ~/quick-start/build/b-smp-leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/smptests/smp03.exe
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > Reading symbols from
> /home/richi/quick-start/build/b-smp-leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/smptests/smp03.exe...
> > (gdb) target extended-remote localhost:1234
> > Remote debugging using localhost:1234
> > 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> > (gdb) load
> > Loading section .text, size 0x20440 lma 0x40000000
> > Loading section .rtemsroset, size 0x90 lma 0x40020440
> > Loading section .data, size 0x690 lma 0x40028500
> > Start address 0x40000000, load size 133984
> > Transfer rate: 1063 KB/sec, 271 bytes/write.
> > (gdb) b _Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Get_highest_ready
> > Breakpoint 1 at 0x4000e620: _Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Get_highest_ready. (4
> locations)
> > (gdb) continue
> > Continuing.
> >
> > Breakpoint 1, _Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Get_highest_ready (filter=0x40029000
> <_RTEMS_tasks_Objects+576>,
> > context=0x4002bc28 <_Configuration_Scheduler_EDF_SMP_dflt>)
> > at
> /home/richi/quick-start/src/rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/scheduleredfsmp.c:151
> > 151 self = _Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Get_self( context );
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x4000e624 151 self = _Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Get_self( context );
> > (gdb) stepi
> > RBTree_Control_RB_MINMAX (val=-1, head=head at entry=0x4002bc74
> <_Configuration_Scheduler_EDF_SMP_dflt+76>)
> > at
> /home/richi/quick-start/src/rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/rbtreenext.c:37
> > 37 {
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x4001787c 37 {
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x40017880 37 {
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x40017884 37 {
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x40017890 37 {
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x40017894 37 {
> > (gdb) stepi
> > _RBTree_Minimum (tree=tree at entry=0x4002bc74
> <_Configuration_Scheduler_EDF_SMP_dflt+76>)
> > at
> /home/richi/quick-start/src/rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/rbtreenext.c:39
> > 39 }
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x400178a0 39 }
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x400178a4 39 }
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x400178a8 39 }
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x4000e628 in _Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Get_highest_ready (filter=0x40029000
> <_RTEMS_tasks_Objects+576>,
> > context=0x4002bc28 <_Configuration_Scheduler_EDF_SMP_dflt>)
> > at
> /home/richi/quick-start/src/rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/scheduleredfsmp.c:151
> > 151 self = _Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Get_self( context );
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 164
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x4000e630 164
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x4000e634 164
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x4000e638 164
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 175
> > (gdb) stepi
> > 0x4000e694 175
> > (gdb)
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Now I can't figure out why gdb won't show me the next instruction after
> 151 self = _Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Get_self( context );? Why is it jumping to
> instruction 164 and later to 175? What might be going wrong? Please let me
> know.
> >
>
> This can happen because of compiler optimizations. The order of the
> assembly instructions in the program does not need to match exactly
> the order in the source code, and some source lines might not have any
> assembly associated with them. You can turn off optimization, or you
> can compare the debug execution with the assembly program, to try to
> get some more insight.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Richi.
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:55 PM Richi Dubey <richidubey at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot! It is working now after I set appropriate breakpoints.
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:58 PM Jiri Gaisler <jiri at gaisler.se> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 5/26/20 2:55 PM, Richi Dubey wrote:
> >> > > Hii,
> >> > >
> >> > > Thank you for your replies. I did not load the program before
> >> > > executing run on gdb. Now it works fine.
> >> > >
> >> > > However, I need your help with one more thing. When I run gdb with
> >> > > stepi or nexti to see how the code runs from the beginning to the
> end,
> >> > > gdb always ends up going in an infinite loop in hard_reset () at
> >> > >
> /home/richi/quick-start/src/rtems/c/src/lib/libbsp/sparc/leon3/../../../../../../bsps/sparc/shared/start/start.S:274
> >> > > while only executing the following commands:
> >> > >
> >> > > 371 std %g0,[%g2]
> >> > > (gdb)
> >> > > 372 add %g2,8,%g2
> >> > > (gdb)
> >> > > 373 cmp %g2,%g3
> >> > > (gdb)
> >> > > 374 bleu,a zerobss
> >> > > (gdb)
> >> > > 375 nop
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > while the code in start.s is:
> >> > >
> >> > > zerobss:
> >> > > std %g0,[%g2]
> >> > > add %g2,8,%g2
> >> > > cmp %g2,%g3
> >> > > bleu,a zerobss
> >> > > nop
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Can someone please tell me why gdb is not going back to the main
> file
> >> > > smpschededf02/init.c? Is it because we keep running start.s during
> the
> >> > > entire time of execution?
> >> >
> >> > zerobss: function is not infinite, it just loops for many thousands
> (millions) iterations while it clears the bss segment. SIngle-stepping
> though zerobss: will obviously take a VERY long time, so put a breakpoint
> on somewhere after it has been called.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > And how do I run gdb while going through
> >> > > every instruction that init.c processes without getting stuck in an
> >> > > infinite loop like this. I set up a breakpoint at Init and
> everythings
> >> > > work fine but I am stilling missing the commands that were executed
> >> > > before Init.c was called. How do I see those?
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, If I use step with breakpoint at Init, it again goes into an
> >> > > infinite loop inside apbuart_polled.c with the following commands:
> >> > >
> >> > > 20 while ( (regs->status & APBUART_STATUS_TE) == 0 ) {
> >> > > (gdb)
> >> > > 22 __asm__ volatile ("nop"::); __asm__ volatile ("nop"::);
> >> > > (gdb)
> >> > > 23 __asm__ volatile ("nop"::); __asm__ volatile ("nop"::);
> >> > > (gdb)
> >> > > 24 __asm__ volatile ("nop"::); __asm__ volatile ("nop"::);
> >> > > (gdb)
> >> > > 25 __asm__ volatile ("nop"::); __asm__ volatile ("nop"::);
> >> > >
> >> > > Why is it running into an infinite loop?(If I use nexti, it does not
> >> > > run into an infinite loop as next does get inside functions, and
> Init
> >> > > finishes successfully).
> >> >
> >> > The loop is not infinite, it just loops while waiting for the UART
> transmitter to send out a character. nexti puts a breakpoint after the
> loop, that is why it finishes.
> >> >
> >> > Jiri.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Richi.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:44 AM Jiri Gaisler <jiri at gaisler.se>
> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On 5/25/20 4:30 PM, Richi Dubey wrote:
> >> > >>> Hii everyone,
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> When I am executing smpschededf02.exe on my leon3 bsp running on
> >> > >>> sparc5 with sparc-rtems5-sis with -m 4 -leon3 option, it fails to
> >> > >>> execute properly.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I have built leon3 with --enable-smp option and I am guessing the
> >> > >>> execution fails because I don not see any output of the test and
> I can
> >> > >>> only see the following output:
> >> > >>> ---------------------------------------------
> >> > >>> ~/quick-start/rtems/5/bin$ ./sparc-rtems5-sis -leon3 -m 4
> >> > >>>
> ~/quick-start/build/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02.exe
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> SIS - SPARC/RISCV instruction simulator 2.21, copyright Jiri
> Gaisler 2019
> >> > >>> Bug-reports to jiri at gaisler.se
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> LEON3 emulation enabled, 4 cpus online, delta 50 clocks
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Loaded
> /home/richi/quick-start/build/leon3/sparc-rtems5/c/leon3/testsuites/smptests/smpschededf02.exe,
> >> > >>> entry 0x40000000
> >> > >>> cpu0> run
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> *** BEGIN OF TEST SMPSCHEDEDF 2 ***
> >> > >>> *** TEST VERSION: 5.0.0.20a8361de4724658112ecd33c28fae82a15919f8
> >> > >>> *** TEST STATE: EXPECTED_PASS
> >> > >>> *** TEST BUILD: RTEMS_NETWORKING RTEMS_POSIX_API RTEMS_SMP
> >> > >>> *** TEST TOOLS: 7.5.0 20191114 (RTEMS 5, RSB 5 (0b7e87143b76),
> Newlib fbaa096)
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> *** END OF TEST SMPSCHEDEDF 2 ***
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> cpu 1 in error mode (tt = 0x80)
> >> > >>> 3491850 40016360: 91d02000 ta 0x0
> >> > >>> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> Looks good to me, test passed OK and processor is halted by RTEMS.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> On running the program with gdb with extended-remote and debugging
> >> > >>> with sis, I am encountering the following error:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> ----------------------
> >> > >>> (gdb) target extended-remote localhost:1234
> >> > >>> Remote debugging using localhost:1234
> >> > >>> 0x00000000 in ?? ()
> >> > >>> (gdb)
> >> > >>> ------------------------
> >> > >> This is indeed how you start remote debugging, but then you also
> have to do:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> load
> >> > >>
> >> > >> run
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Then the program should run as expected ...
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Jiri.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > >> devel mailing list
> >> > >> devel at rtems.org
> >> > >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200702/68bbf6b1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list