[PATCH 2/2] Add a message to run 'pytest' to run rest of test suite.

[Sebastian Huber]

On 17/03/2020 01:05, Amar Takhar wrote:

> On 2020-03-17 10:55 +1100, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 17/3/20 7:21 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Chris, what do you think about using pytest in favour of the standard Python
>>> unitttest?
>> I am fine with pytest. Testing is a development feature and so we can have a
>> different criteria for the needed dependencies.
> If we're choosing pytest I'd like to see explicit documentation of what pattern
> to use for which situations.
>
> It's really easy to fall into traditional patterns for non Python languages
> which means we lose advantages of going to pytest.
This sounds like a great addition to the Testing section in the new 
Python Development Guidelines chapter of the engineering manual.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200317/c60937cc/attachment.html>