What sanitizers preferred?

[suyash singh]

Yes it uses virtual memory. I confirmed from a LLVM sanitizer contributor.



On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 9:35 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> On 15/03/2020 17:52, suyash singh wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Out of
> AddressSanitizer <http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html>,
> ThreadSanitizer <http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSanitizer.html>,
> MemorySanitizer <http://clang.llvm.org/docs/MemorySanitizer.html>, and
> DataFlowSanitizer <http://clang.llvm.org/docs/DataFlowSanitizer.html>.
>
> Are all of them useful as RTEMS-tools to integrate? Any other sanitizers
> suggested?
>
> Asking as part of my proposed gsoc project,
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OerM8Iix7PbDUCyb_J_KEzcMgLbvdqxd4FnK_BqI7XI/edit?usp=sharing
>
> I am not sure of these sanitizers can be used in RTEMS at all. We don't
> have virtual memory. Firstly, it would be necessary to check for each
> sanitizer if it uses virtual memory. If yes, then is this absolutely
> necessary or just convenient? Also the sanitizers are not available on all
> LLVM architectures. We have to evaluate if the architectures-specific
> adoptions can be used in RTEMS.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200318/417b7a3b/attachment.html>