Sources to port fenv.h to ARM and AARCH64

[Vaibhav Gupta]

>
> >>
>> >> I have cloned this NetBSD Sources. As I can see those
>> >> architecture-specific implemented methods here. Please correct me if I
>> >> am looking into different than what you are looking for.
>> >>
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/powerpc/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/sh/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/mips64/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/amd64/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/arm/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/i387/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/hppa/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/m88k/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/alpha/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/sparc64/fenv.c
>> >> ./lib/libm/arch/aarch64/fenv.c
>> >> ./regress/lib/libm/fenv/fenv.c
>> >
>> >
>> > That's what I see browsing the repo.
>> >
>> > The single file NetBSD looks easy to integrate. Would be similar to the
>> x86_64 or i386 there now on file layout.
>> >
>> > Does the freebsd support more hardware variants?
>>
>> FreeBSD does not have fenv support for some architecture like RISCV,
>> M88k, alpha architecture, I can see netbsd support more
>> hardware variants. NetBSD includes fenv support for these architecture
>> also.
>>
>
> +1
>
> NetBSD has more architectures and looks easier to integrate. But we need
> to be
> sure the NetBSD implementation for an specific architecture covers all the
> cases
> that FreeBSD does. If equal, pick the more that is easier to integrate.
>
> --joel
>
Last year I found various sources:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-July/026580.html

https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2019-July/054391.html

--Vaibhav
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20200322/f874d522/attachment.html>