[PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

[Sebastian Huber]

On 06/05/2020 10:41, chrisj at rtems.org wrote:

> From: Chris Johns<chrisj at rtems.org>
>
> Updates #2962
> ---
>   bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg
>
> diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg b/bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..b0d2a05086
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/bsps/powerpc/psim/config/psim-testsuite.tcfg
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +#
> +# PSIM RTEMS Test Database.
> +#
> +# Format is one line per test that is_NOT_  built.
> +#
> +
> +expected-fail: fsimfsgeneric01
> +expected-fail: block11
> +expected-fail: rbheap01
> +expected-fail: termios01
> +expected-fail: ttest01
> +expected-fail: psx12
> +expected-fail: psxchroot01
> +expected-fail: psxfenv01
> +expected-fail: psximfs02
> +expected-fail: psxpipe01
> +expected-fail: spextensions01
> +expected-fail: spfatal31
> +expected-fail: spfifo02
> +expected-fail: spmountmgr01
> +expected-fail: spprivenv01
> +expected-fail: spstdthreads01

I don't think these tests are expected to fail. If they fail, then there 
is a bug somewhere.