[PATCH v4] cpukit/librcxx: Add a C++ thread interface with attributes
chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Oct 6 22:31:42 UTC 2020
On 7/10/20 1:55 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:02 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>> On 5/10/20 6:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 03/10/2020 08:23, chrisj at rtems.org wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/c++/error b/cpukit/include/rtems/c++/error
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000000..8b9d875e0f
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/c++/error
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
>>>> +/* -*- C++ -*-
>>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Chris Johns (http://contemporary.software)
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>>>> + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>>>> + * are met:
>>> Could you please use the new file template:
>>> Do we really need editor-specific comments in the header files?
>> Does it matter?
> That depends. Is the filetype comment embedding standardized across
> common editors?
I do not know but the names will change. :)
I feel we should be OK with editor comments if they are needed. In this case we
can avoid them for other reasons.
>>> Maybe just use a *.h or *.hpp header file name?
>> The file namea are inline with the names C++ uses.
> This is related. For example, Windows does not do well with
> extensionless filenames.
MSVC supports the standard's naming.
> Neither do humans. It makes us have to guess
> unless we open with our tools. I get that the C++ committee likes the
> #include <something> without the .h/.hpp/.* but I find it annoying. I
> also won't find these files with
> find . -name "*.h*"
> or any kind of regex for that matter. I'm not convinced about these
> extensionless filenames at all.
I do not know the history to suitably debate the merits. The C++ standards
people made this change for C++ as the early versions of C++ such as cfront 3.0
used .h. They may document the reason.
More information about the devel