[PATCH v2] User Manual languages section
joel at rtems.org
Mon Oct 19 15:43:27 UTC 2020
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:20 AM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> Thanks for this. Someone should at least add TBD stubs for a few
> languages. If we say nothing, the assumption is there is nothing to
> say. You can open a ticket, assign it to me if you like. It will take
> some research to find the set of languages.
+1 Please add a TBD section for at least C and Ada along with a comment
that points to a ticket for it.
This will get lost otherwise.
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 4:01 PM <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Thank you for the reviews and comments of the v1 patch. I believe I have
> > addressed the items raised in the review comments.
> > I have not added sections for languages I do not know about or use. I
> > it is best those who know the language and support it should add a
> > I understand this patch maybe feel unbalanced but I would rather attempt
> > a start at a section with what I know thana having to wait for me to
> > and research and test Ada and Fortran.
> > Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel