BSP maintenance (was Re: set_vector() on SPARC)

[Thomas Doerfler]

Chris,

hm, isn't this something related to our tiering of architectures/BSPs?
Those who have a maintainer/test board should detect any fault due to
the proposed change rather soon/at the next regular test. Those who are
not in constant testing... well they are not tier 1, right?

wkr,

Thomas.

Am 20.10.20 um 04:32 schrieb Chris Johns:
> If these architectures are not being maintained as you suggest where do we
> document this and how do we inform the users?
> 
> If you did update the architectures to remove set_vector are they now maintained?
> 
> Is updating the code without being able to test the changes maintaining an
> architecture or BSP or do we require some level of testing?
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------
embedded brains GmbH
Thomas Doerfler
Dornierstr. 4
D-82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: Thomas.Doerfler at embedded-brains.de
Phone: +49-89-18 94 741-12
Fax:   +49-89-18 94 741-09
PGP: Public key available on request.
For our privacy statement, see
https://embedded-brains.de/en/data-privacy-statement/