Fatal exceptions on context-switching for more than two isolated threads
Utkarsh Rai
utkarsh.rai60 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 23 15:36:38 UTC 2020
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:23 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 22/10/2020 02:40, Utkarsh Rai wrote:
>
> > Hello, this thread has gone a bit cold over the last few weeks, due to
> > my engagement in the university tests. I have provided a debug trace
> > for the issue. The reason for fatal exceptions is the fact that while
> > iterating over the chain of user extensions we access a node whose
> > memory location has been set to NO-ACCESS during the context switch.
> > Is there any work-around to this?
>
> The option is to move the User_extensions_Iterator storage out of the
> stack to Thread_Control and Per_CPU_Control.
>
>
Does this mean that I should add User_extensions_Iterator field in the
Thread_Control structure for the case
when we enable thread stack protection?
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20201023/4ba7def2/attachment.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list