[PATCH v1 0/6] [libbsd] Fix e1000 driver for i386 in master and 5

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Fri Sep 11 05:38:42 UTC 2020

On 10/9/20 9:34 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10/09/2020 12:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 09/09/2020 17:28, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>>>>> I am not sure if the 5 branch in the rtems-libbsd.git repo is right and if it
>>>>>> should be made from the 5-freebsd-12 branch? I feel it is currently confusing
>>>>>> but either way it has issues.
>>>>> Maybe, we can continue to discuss that outside of this patch set? Renaming
>>>>> a branch later should be no trouble.
>>>>> An option could be to rename 5 -> 5-freebsd-master, then the mapping
>>>>> between rtems and FreeBSD would always be explicit.
>>>> Yes this is one Joel mentioned the other day and I missed the context in
>>>> relation to these patches. I think moving 5 to 5-freebsd-master makes sense.
>>>> What we have is confusing.
>>> +1
>>> Would be good to get Christian or Sebastian to comment/agree :)
>> Yes, the branch name "5" makes no sense. It should be "5-freebsd-master".
> Actually, I think we should delete this branch or is there someone willing to
> maintain it? 

If that is the case why have 5-freebsd-12? Why not make it 5 and then all the
repos are the same?

> The libbsd branch recommended for RTEMS 5 is 5-freebsd-12.

Do we maintain FreeBSD related fixes off the freebsd-12 release branch only?


More information about the devel mailing list