BSP Test Results
chrisj at rtems.org
Sat Sep 12 00:12:49 UTC 2020
On 9/9/20 6:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 09/09/2020 02:36, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 9/9/20 3:13 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 8:55 PM Chris Johns<chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>> An example using Joel's recent test run (thanks Joel :)). The sparc/leon2
>>>> results show no regressions:
>>>> Passed: 580
>>>> Failed: 0
>>>> User Input: 6
>>>> Expected Fail: 1
>>> Is there a ticket for this one? out of curiosity.
>> I do not think so. This and any others will need to be cleaned up once I
>> implement the change to support ticket numbers. I will do that as part of the
>> change seems I added the expected-fail states.
> I think it is this one:
> Maybe the expected-fail state should report a ticket number (or link).
Yes. With the ticket number and an internet connection the state of the ticket
can be queried and the subject and state can be used on the test report. For
example the state is expected-fail, the test failed as expected but the ticket
is closed or the other way around the test passes and the ticket is open.
More information about the devel