[PATCH v1 6/8] score: Add AArch64 port

Kinsey Moore kinsey.moore at oarcorp.com
Fri Sep 25 18:45:11 UTC 2020

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 11:20
To: Kinsey Moore <kinsey.moore at oarcorp.com>; devel at rtems.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] score: Add AArch64 port

On 25/09/2020 17:27, Kinsey Moore wrote:

> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/tls.h 
> b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/tls.h
> index 65a49d87be..8c15eee569 100644
> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/tls.h
> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/tls.h
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ typedef struct TLS_Thread_control_block {
>     struct TLS_Thread_control_block *tcb;
>   #else /* !__i386__ */
>     TLS_Dynamic_thread_vector *dtv;
>     uintptr_t reserved;
>   #endif
>   #endif /* __i386__ */
Are you sure this is correct? TLS_Dynamic_thread_vector *dtv; is 8 bytes in this case.
Dropping this change causes sptls01 to fail. This was added pretty early in the implementation, so I've just had to go back and refresh my memories of the reasoning behind it which still may not be entirely accurate. Sptls01 fails without this patch because under AArch64/LP64, gcc and gdb expect a 16 byte offset to the TLS data segment. If this patch is not present, the TCB is half the size it needs to be and so getting a TLS variable address ends up indexing into the TCB+TLS data segment at a compiler-expected offset that does not correspond to the actual data layout. I adjusted this to match the compiler's offset expectations. There may be a better way to fix this issue, but this is the most appropriate location I could find that made the most sense. The biggest worry I have here is that this may break other architectures that also have 8 byte pointers. When I fix the file headers, I'll see if I can make this more specific to AArch64.


More information about the devel mailing list