Ticket#3889 updated

Mon Apr 5 16:23:35 UTC 2021

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 4:04 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
<zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch> wrote:
>
> Thanks so much I was able to get it working! I was able to modify the test code and i was able to create the clock with the  clock monotonic.
>
> I basically changed the the clock create argument to CLOCK_MONOTONIC which should test the branch. During test it failed at
>
>
>   puts( "timer_create - OK" );
>   status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer );
>   posix_service_failed( status, "timer_create OK" );
> which  gave me the error of   FAILED -- errno (22 - Invalid argument)
>
>
> I only see a case in psxcreatetimer.c for CLOCK_REALTIME which could be that it's just unimplimented.
>
>
>
> My question is there anything I overlooked for this issue? I think the only thing was to change the create argument? Also if this is the extent of the code that that has to be test I'm thinking just to add it into the exiting psxtimer02.c file.

It is preferable that each test provides somewhat self-contained
API/feature testing so that we can easier isolate what is
broken/missing.

In general, the first step toward implementing features in RTEMS is to
create/submit a test case. then follow a test-driven development
approach to implement features until the test works. We don't always
merge broken tests though for unimplemented features.

> Also for coverage testing I was not able to get to test it due to a error: symbol parser write failed for score error.
>
Alex may be able to help you with running coverage. It has been
undergoing heavy revision lately.

> thanks
> zack
>
>
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Friday, April 2, 2021 9:08 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:19 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
> > zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch wrote:
> >
> > > Yes the build works successfully. I tried to also just try BUILD_PSXTESTS only and it failed midway. I also tried to do an automated build. It failed with __start symbol not found.
> >
> > You also need to enable the POSIX API/signals, in your config.ini add
> > RTEMS_POSIX_API = True
> >
> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > On Thursday, April 1, 2021 10:10 PM, Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:52 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
> > > > zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Did i do anything wrong with my .ini file?
> > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > > On Wednesday, March 31, 2021 12:20 AM, zack_on_the_speed_chanel zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > my waf file look like this
> > > > > > $cat config.ini
> > > > > > [sparc/leon3]
> > > > > > BUILD_TESTS=True
> > > > > > for rebuilding the bsp I ran:
> > > > > > ./waf configure
> > > > > > ./waf
> > > >
> > > > This looks right, nothing obvious to me.
> > > > Does the waf build finish successfully, or does it stop with an error?
> > > >
> > > > > > Zack
> > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > > > On Tuesday, March 30, 2021 9:02 PM, Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 2:41 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
> > > > > > > zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have both of the options and i tried to built it with BUILD_TESTS and PSXTESTS and the test didn't build. Is there anything else that could alter how rtems is built?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > After you set them to True, did you re-run waf configure before waf build?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > > > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > > > > > On Tuesday, March 30, 2021 3:29 PM, Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > BUILD_TESTS and BUILD_PSXTESTS are two options that
> > > > > > > > > if either is True it should build psxclock02.
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:20 AM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
> > > > > > > > > zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I did build the leon3 bsp and I still don't see the psxtimer02 as an executable. Is there a way build a test from source? I have the sources for psxtest02. Also i'm thinking that it could be due to the fact that i don't have posix tests enabled. Is there a way
> > > > > > > > > > that to enable posix?
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > Zack
> > > > > > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > > > > > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > > > > > > > On Monday, March 29, 2021 8:11 PM, zack_on_the_speed_chanel zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sorry that assumption was very native of me that i didn't have a working baseline. Joel said that the erc32 was similar to the leon bsp
> > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > The ERC32 what's the first space hardened sparc processor. The leon3 is a
> > > > > > > > > > > later processor in the same family. Both use the same build of GCC and are
> > > > > > > > > > > just different bsps. In fact both run on the same sis simulator. "
> > > > > > > > > > > I also though that the bsps were the same and I can work on the issue with only the erc32 BSP. I have one more question: when i run the hello world test. All the test files are within one specific directory and I don't see the executables for specific bsps that's why i thought all tests would be built (there would not be any specific considerations for bsps) .
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > > > > > > > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, March 29, 2021 2:45 PM, Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 1:26 PM zack_on_the_speed_chanel
> > > > > > > > > > > > zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm updating on what' i've found out with the issue (forgot to reply all) . Joel recommended me check the coverage for the leon BSP( to check if it's supported) and i found that the branch with CLOCK_MONOTONIC was not reached I think now that it's supported (because the annotated assembly is in the sparc instruction set). I also found out that the test would be similar to Psxclock02 and it runs the same tests on a different clock. Then I tried to build the psxclock02 test , change the create_clock to have the clock_monotonic argument and i didn't see the executable or any change in the ./waf build. Then I was suggested that you have to enable all tests some how? How do i enable all tests?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Do you use something like: ./waf bsp_defaults ---rtems-bsp=leon3 > config.ini
> > > > > > > > > > > > Then, take a look, BUILD_TESTS and BUILD_PSXTESTS are two options that
> > > > > > > > > > > > if either is True it should build psxclock02.
> > > > > > > > > > > > When you write code, you should first make sure you can build the code
> > > > > > > > > > > > as it exists if it is supposed to work, and run it to see that it
> > > > > > > > > > > > works. Then you should make changes from a working baseline. Otherwise
> > > > > > > > > > > > when you get a problem, how do you know if the problem is your
> > > > > > > > > > > > problem, or it already existed?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Zack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > devel mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > > > > devel at rtems.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>