[PATCH rtems-net-legacy v3] netlegacy: Use os.path instead of hardcoded Unix like path

[Vijay Kumar Banerjee]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:22 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <vijay at rtems.org>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:40 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 15/4/21 5:22 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:10 PM Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:36 PM Vijay Kumar Banerjee <
vijay at rtems.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> ---
> > >>>  netlegacy.py | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
> > >>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/netlegacy.py b/netlegacy.py
> > >>> index 05cb78a..2936b8f 100644
> > >>> --- a/netlegacy.py
> > >>> +++ b/netlegacy.py
> > >>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ exclude_headers = ['rtems-bsd-user-space.h',
'rtems-bsd-kernel-space.h']
> > >>>
> > >>>  for root, dirs, files in os.walk("."):
> > >>>      [dirs.remove(d) for d in list(dirs) if d in exclude_dirs]
> > >>> -    dirs.append('./bsps/shared/net')
> > >>> +    dirs.append(os.path.join('bsps', 'shared', 'net'))
> > >>>      include_files[root[2:]] = []
> > >>>      for name in files:
> > >>>          ext = os.path.splitext(name)[1]
> > >>> @@ -59,10 +59,9 @@ def build(bld):
> > >>>      include_path = []
> > >>>      ip = ''
> > >>>      bsp = bld.env.RTEMS_ARCH_BSP.split('-')[-1]
> > >>> -    pppd_source = [os.path.join('./pppd', s)
> > >>> -                   for s in os.listdir('./pppd') if s[-2:] == '.c']
> > >>> -    telnetd_source = [os.path.join('./telnetd', s)
> > >>> -                      for s in os.listdir('telnetd') if s[-2:] ==
'.c']
> > >>> +    pppd_source = [os.path.join('pppd', s)
> > >>> +                   for s in os.listdir('pppd')
> > >>> +                   if os.path.splitext(s)[1] == '.c']
> > >> This indentation looks wrong?
> > >>
> > > This looks good with git show. I'm not sure what happened here, maybe
> > > it looks weird due to email formatting?
> >
> > Embedded tab character?
> I'm not sure what's the issue here. Generally, git show output shows
> any irregularity. This indentation looks right when I open it on mutt.
> This is probably some issue with the email formatting. I see that some
> of the removed codes in this patch also have crooked indentation but
> they look properly indented upstream.
>
Hi,

Just wanted to add that I pushed the commit in my private repository and
the indentation looks alright. Please have a look:
https://git.rtems.org/vijay/rtems-net-legacy.git/commit/?id=c61fb1cf8517cb5d42568b48721056cf15a3bb40

Best regards,
Vijay
> >
> > Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210415/097d7578/attachment.html>