[PATCH] Updated tick implementation for HAL_GetTick

[Robin Müller]

Yes, I tried to switch oscillator and clock init in the start hook, but
that did not appear to solve the issue.

Kind Regards
Robin

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 19:24, Robin Müller <robin.mueller.m at gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is really odd.. THe function is already called in the start up hook
> function init_oscillator() before init.c . Maybe this is problematic.
> The code crashes in line 508 of kern_tc.c (see rtems-crash.png).
>
> Kind Regards
> Robin
>
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 19:09, Robin Müller <robin.mueller.m at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Okay, there is some issue with the rtems function to get the uptime
>> nanoseconds.. The call appears to crash for some reason.
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> Robin
>>
>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 18:31, Robin Mueller <robin.mueller.m at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This now uses rtems_clock_get_uptime_nanoseconds
>>> to calculate the uptime ticks in milliseconds.
>>> ---
>>>  bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/bspstart.c | 4 +++-
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/bspstart.c
>>> b/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/bspstart.c
>>> index 2fc8133cca..7ae39f1410 100644
>>> --- a/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/bspstart.c
>>> +++ b/bsps/arm/stm32h7/start/bspstart.c
>>> @@ -32,9 +32,11 @@
>>>
>>>  #include <stm32h7xx_hal.h>
>>>
>>> +/* Get number of milliseconds elapsed since startup */
>>>  uint32_t HAL_GetTick(void)
>>>  {
>>> -  return 0;
>>> +  uint64_t temp = rtems_clock_get_uptime_nanoseconds() / (1000 * 1000);
>>> +  return temp;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  uint32_t stm32h7_systick_frequency(void)
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210420/bdc935b1/attachment-0001.html>