test for rtems_workspace_greedy_allocate

Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org
Tue Feb 9 13:59:10 UTC 2021

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:14 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> sbrk() cannot be removed and we need to maintained and test it as a BSP level
> interface.
> This is an nice design idea where the sbrk() pool of memory can be given out to
> the heap or workspace depending on the demands of the application. I can see
> this being important to application frameworks like EPICS and so something we
> should look to add to all architectures.

 Please raise a ticket, this can be a GSoC project idea I think?

More information about the devel mailing list