[PATCH 1/4] assert.h: Add macros to assert status and use it
Gedare Bloom
gedare at rtems.org
Thu Feb 11 21:12:02 UTC 2021
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:28 PM Ryan Long <thisisryanlong at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> These macros are to be used to check the status from calls that are flagged by
> Coverity as 'Unchecked return value'.
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/score/assert.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/assert.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/assert.h
> index cc32448..7efaae4 100644
> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/assert.h
> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/assert.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,36 @@ extern "C" {
> #endif
>
> /**
> + * @brief Assert if unused return value is equal.
Improve this phrase: "is equal to an expected status." maybe
> + *
> + * Assert whether @a _status and @a _value are equal and ensure @a _status is
s/whether/that
> + * marked as used when not building for debug.
> + *
> + * @param _status The return value to be checked.
> + * @param _value Indicates what @a _status is supposed to be.
> + */
> +#define _Assert_Unused_return_value_equal(_status,_value) \
I think "value_is_equal" will be better.
I think the name should be more clear that _status is a variable.
Maybe, _status_variable
Since a status can be a value. Or, call _status as _rv since it is
explicitly a returned value. It need not be a "status" indicator.
Similarily, instead of _value maybe it is better to call it
_check_value explicitly
> + do { \
> + _Assert((_status) == (_value)); \
> + (void) (_status); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +/**
> + * @brief Assert if unused return value is not equal.
> + *
> + * Assert whether @a _status and @a _value are not equal and ensure @a _status
> + * is marked as used when not building for debug.
> + *
> + * @param _status The return value to be checked.
> + * @param _value Indicates what @a _status is not supposed to be.
> + */
> +#define _Assert_Unused_return_value_not_equal(_status,_value) \
Maybe value_is_not
same as above, use _rv instead of _status
> + do { \
> + _Assert((_status) != (_value)); \
> + (void) (_status); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +/**
> * @brief Returns true if thread dispatching is allowed.
> *
> * Thread dispatching can be repressed via _Thread_Disable_dispatch() or
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
More information about the devel
mailing list