[PATCH] part of implimenting a monotonic clock in rtems part of this is not the final patch.

zack_on_the_speed_chanel zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch
Mon Jun 14 20:18:34 UTC 2021


 also i'll revert the posix test that I changed back to normal because it was only for testing.

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Monday, June 14th, 2021 at 8:14 PM, zack_on_the_speed_chanel <zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch> wrote:

> I've made most of the corrections to the code. I fixed up the formatting but I still don't know if I have to add anything for the settime and delete_timer(). i assume as the monotonic clock only affects the value I think it's all I have to do. I also can try to modify a posix test to check my theory.
>
> Thanks
>
> Zack
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>
> On Saturday, June 12th, 2021 at 9:31 AM, Christian Mauderer oss at c-mauderer.de wrote:
>
> > Hello Zack,
> >
> > I don't really know a lot about the timer toppic. So this is more of a
> >
> > style and general suggestion review.
> >
> > On 09/06/2021 20:27, zack wrote:
> >
> > > From: zack zack_on_the_speed_chanel at protonmail.ch
> > >
> > > cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h | 6 ++-
> > >
> > > cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c | 5 +-
> > >
> > > cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >
> > > testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c | 26 +++++++---
> > >
> > > 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h
> > >
> > > index bcbf07a65a..f8cf6115b2 100644
> > >
> > > --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h
> > >
> > > +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h
> > >
> > > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> > >
> > > #include <rtems/score/objectdata.h>
> > >
> > > #include <rtems/score/watchdog.h>
> > > ---------------------------------
> >
> > I think the blank line separated rtems includes from others. So please
> >
> > don't remove it.
> >
> > > +#include <time.h>
> > >
> > > #include <pthread.h>
> > >
> > > #ifdef __cplusplus
> > >
> > > @@ -47,7 +47,9 @@ typedef struct {
> > >
> > > struct itimerspec timer_data; /* Timing data of the timer /
> > >
> > > uint32_t ticks; / Number of ticks of the initialization /
> > >
> > > uint32_t overrun; / Number of expirations of the timer */
> > >
> > > -   struct timespec time; /* Time at which the timer was started */
> > >
> > > -   struct timespec time; /* Time at which the timer was started */
> > >
> >
> > Not sure what changed in that line. Looks like a whitespace change.
> >
> > Please avoid these.
> >
> > > -   clockid_t clock_type;
> >
> > Why a blank line?
> >
> > > } POSIX_Timer_Control;
> > >
> > > /**
> > >
> > > diff --git a/cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c b/cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c
> > >
> > > index a63cf1d100..e78c359bd5 100644
> > >
> > > --- a/cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c
> > >
> > > +++ b/cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c
> > >
> > > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int timer_create(
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > POSIX_Timer_Control *ptimer;
> > >
> > > -   if ( clock_id != CLOCK_REALTIME )
> > >
> > > -   if ( clock_id != CLOCK_REALTIME || clock_id != CLOCK_MONOTONIC )
> > >
> >
> > Not sure about that one. It's allways a bit difficult whith these
> >
> > constructions but I think this one is allways true and therefore will
> >
> > allways return an error.
> >
> > Let's assume clock_id is CLOCK_MONOTONIC. In that case (clock_id !=
> >
> > CLOCK_REALTIME) is true which means that the function will return with
> >
> > an error. The same works for CLOCK_RREALTIME and the second condition.
> >
> > If you apply De Morgan to the term you see that
> >
> > (clock_id != CLOCK_REALTIME || clock_id != CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> >
> > is the same as
> >
> > !(clock_id == CLOCK_REALTIME && clock_id == CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> >
> > The two inner comparisons are exclusive. So that won't work.
> >
> > What you most likely want is a
> >
> > !(clock_id == CLOCK_REALTIME || clock_id == CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> >
> > or with De Morgan again:
> >
> > (clock_id != CLOCK_REALTIME && clock_id != CLOCK_MONOTONIC)
> >
> > >       rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> > >
> > >     if ( !timerid )
> > >
> > >
> > > @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ int timer_create(
> > >
> > > ptimer->timer_data.it_value.tv_nsec = 0;
> > >
> > > ptimer->timer_data.it_interval.tv_sec = 0;
> > >
> > > ptimer->timer_data.it_interval.tv_nsec = 0;
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > -   ptimer->clock_type=clock_id;
> > >
> > > -   _Watchdog_Preinitialize( &ptimer->Timer, _Per_CPU_Get_snapshot() );
> > >
> > >     _Watchdog_Initialize( &ptimer->Timer, _POSIX_Timer_TSR );
> > >
> > >     _Objects_Open_u32(&_POSIX_Timer_Information, &ptimer->Object, 0);
> > >
> > >     diff --git a/cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c b/cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c
> > >
> > >     index ee2a566f0e..62011cde58 100644
> > >
> > >     --- a/cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c
> > >
> > >     +++ b/cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c
> > >
> > >     @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> > >
> > >     #include <rtems/score/todimpl.h>
> > >
> > >     #include <rtems/score/watchdogimpl.h>
> > >
> > >     #include <rtems/seterr.h>
> > >
> > >     +#include <rtems/timespec.h>
> > >
> > >     /*
> > >
> > >     -              - When a timer is initialized, the value of the time in
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > @@ -43,21 +44,67 @@ int timer_gettime(
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > POSIX_Timer_Control *ptimer;
> > >
> > > ISR_lock_Context lock_context;
> > >
> > > -   uint64_t now;
> > >
> > >     uint32_t remaining;
> > >
> > > -         Per_CPU_Control *cpu;
> > >
> > >
> > > -         struct  timespec * now; // get time now either with
> > >
> > >
> > > -         struct  timespec * expire; // expire
> > >
> > >
> > > -         struct  timespec * result;// get remaining time
> > >
> > >
> > >     if ( !value )
> > >
> > > -   rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> > >
> > > -   rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> > >
> > >     ptimer = _POSIX_Timer_Get( timerid, &lock_context );
> > >
> > > -   if ( ptimer != NULL ) {
> > >
> > > -   Per_CPU_Control *cpu;
> > >
> > > -   if(ptimer== NULL ){
> > >
> >
> > Style: There should be a space before the ==
> >
> > > -   rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> > > -   }
> > >
> > > +if ( ptimer->clock_type ==CLOCK_REALTIME) {
> >
> > Style again: Space after ==
> >
> > Why that many blank lines?
> >
> > > -   cpu = _POSIX_Timer_Acquire_critical( ptimer, &lock_context );
> > >
> > > -              _TOD_Get(now); // get current time
> > >
> > >
> > > -            rtems_timespec_from_ticks (ptimer->Timer.expire,expire ); // get the time to expire
> > >
> > >
> >
> > That are C++ style comments. We normally have C-Style comments in RTEMS
> >
> > only. Beneath that the comments exceed the line length. And some of them
> >
> > are quite superflous. A _TOD_Get(now) doesn't need any comment. The line
> >
> > is already telling that.
> >
> > Again: Blank lines. I won't mention the further blank lines below!
> >
> > > -   if (now->tv_nsec+now->tv_sec > expire->tv_nsec+expire->tv_sec) { // check if the time expired
> > >
> > > -            rtems_timespec_subtract (now ,expire , result); //
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Empty comment at the end of the line?
> >
> > > -          remaining = (uint32_t) result->tv_nsec+result->tv_sec;
> > >
> > >
> > > -   } else {
> > >
> > > -          remaining = 0;
> > >
> > >
> > > -   }
> > >
> > > -   _Timespec_From_ticks( remaining, &value->it_value );
> > >
> > > -   value->it_interval = ptimer->timer_data.it_interval;
> > >
> > > -   _POSIX_Timer_Release( cpu, &lock_context );
> > >
> > > -   return 0;
> > >
> > > -   }
> > >
> > >
> > > +if ( ptimer->clock_type ==CLOCK_MONOTONIC) {
> >
> > Odd indentation and missing blank before the closing bracket.
> >
> > Indentation and some blanks on brackets seems to be a problem on quite
> >
> > some more lines too.
> >
> > > -         cpu = _POSIX_Timer_Acquire_critical( ptimer, &lock_context );
> > >
> > >
> > > -   now = cpu->Watchdog.ticks;
> > >
> > > -           _Timecounter_Nanouptime(now );
> > >
> > >
> > > -            rtems_timespec_from_ticks (ptimer->Timer.expire,expire );
> > >
> > >
> > > -   if (now->tv_nsec+now->tv_sec > expire->tv_nsec+expire->tv_sec) {
> > >
> > > -            rtems_timespec_subtract (now, expire, result);
> > >
> > >
> > > -   if ( now < ptimer->Timer.expire ) {
> > >
> > > -          remaining = (uint32_t) ( ptimer->Timer.expire - now );
> > >
> > >
> > > -          remaining = (uint32_t) result->tv_nsec+result->tv_sec;
> > >           } else {
> > >             remaining = 0;
> > >           }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c b/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c
> > >
> > > index 9f79d33c42..029e638c76 100644
> > >
> > > --- a/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c
> > >
> > > +++ b/testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c
> > >
> > > @@ -59,17 +59,31 @@ void *POSIX_Init (
> > >
> > > fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad clock id" );
> > >
> > >     puts( "timer_create - bad timer id pointer - EINVAL" );
> > >
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_REALTIME, &event, NULL );
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &event, NULL );
> > >
> > >     fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad timer id" );
> > >
> >
> > It seems that you replace the test for REALTIME timers. Are they no
> >
> > longer supported with your changes? I'm not sure whether that is a good
> >
> > idea because it would break all existing applications that use REALTIME
> >
> > timer.
> >
> > >     puts( "timer_create - OK" );
> > >
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_REALTIME, NULL, &timer );
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer );
> > >
> > >     posix_service_failed( status, "timer_create OK" );
> > >
> > >     puts( "timer_create - too many - EAGAIN" );
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_REALTIME, NULL, &timer1 );
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer1 );
> > >
> > >     fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EAGAIN, "too many" );
> > >
> > > -   puts( "timer_create (monotonic) - bad timer id pointer - EINVAL" );
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &event, NULL );
> > >
> > > -   fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad timer id" );
> > >
> > > -   puts( "timer_create (Monotonic) - OK" );
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer );
> > >
> > > -   posix_service_failed( status, "timer_create OK" );
> > >
> > > -   puts( "timer_create (monotonic)- too many - EAGAIN" );
> > >
> > > -   status = timer_create( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, NULL, &timer1 );
> > >
> > > -   fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EAGAIN, "too many" );
> > >
> > > -   puts( "timer_delete - bad id - EINVAL" );
> > >
> > >     status = timer_delete( timer1 + 1 );
> > >
> > >     fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad id" );
> > >
> > >     @@ -100,14 +114,14 @@ void *POSIX_Init (
> > >
> > >     status = timer_settime( timer, TIMER_ABSTIME, &itimer, NULL );
> > >
> > >     fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad itimer value #2" );
> > >
> > > -   clock_gettime( CLOCK_REALTIME, &now );
> > >
> > > -   clock_gettime( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &now );
> > >
> > >     itimer.it_value = now;
> > >
> > >     itimer.it_value.tv_sec = itimer.it_value.tv_sec - 1;
> > >
> > >     puts( "timer_settime - bad itimer value - previous time - EINVAL" );
> > >
> > >     status = timer_settime( timer, TIMER_ABSTIME, &itimer, NULL );
> > >
> > >     fatal_posix_service_status_errno( status, EINVAL, "bad itimer value #3" );
> > >
> > > -   clock_gettime( CLOCK_REALTIME, &now );
> > >
> > > -   clock_gettime( CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &now );
> > >
> > >     itimer.it_value = now;
> > >
> > >     itimer.it_value.tv_sec = itimer.it_value.tv_sec + 1;
> > >
> > >     puts( "timer_settime - bad id - EINVAL" );
> > >
> > >     @@ -129,4 +143,4 @@ void *POSIX_Init (
> > >
> > >     TEST_END();
> > >
> > >     rtems_test_exit (0);
> > >
> > >     -}
> > >
> > >     +}
> > >
> > >     \ No newline at end of file
> > >
> >
> > devel mailing list
> >
> > devel at rtems.org
> >
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


More information about the devel mailing list