[PATCH 09/22] covoar: Fix DWARF reading
chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Mar 2 23:40:53 UTC 2021
On 3/3/21 10:32 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 5:16 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
> On 2/3/21 7:01 am, Alex White wrote:
> > There were a couple of issues with the way the DWARF info was being
> > read. The first issue was that it inefficiently included all symbols,
> > even symbols that were not desired. The second issue is that it did
> > not handle inline functions correctly. These have been fixed.
> > ---
> > rtemstoolkit/rld-dwarf.cpp | 8 ++-
> > rtemstoolkit/rld-dwarf.h | 5 ++
> The RLD dwarf changes are fine. Should this be a separate patch to the covoar
> That's what Gedare asked for when he suggested splitting the set into areas.
I see this now. I was working through the patches.
> Alex can you separate out the RLD?
> If Chris was ok with them all, just repost them as a self-contained set and
> he can ack the cover-letter for the RLD set.
Thank you, this would be a help. The changes are looking good, just minor things
from my point of view.
More information about the devel