[PATCH 09/22] covoar: Fix DWARF reading

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Mar 2 23:40:53 UTC 2021

On 3/3/21 10:32 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 5:16 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
>     On 2/3/21 7:01 am, Alex White wrote:
>     > There were a couple of issues with the way the DWARF info was being
>     > read. The first issue was that it inefficiently included all symbols,
>     > even symbols that were not desired. The second issue is that it did
>     > not handle inline functions correctly. These have been fixed.
>     > ---
>     >  rtemstoolkit/rld-dwarf.cpp      |   8 ++-
>     >  rtemstoolkit/rld-dwarf.h        |   5 ++
>     The RLD dwarf changes are fine. Should this be a separate patch to the covoar
>     changes?
> That's what Gedare asked for when he suggested splitting the set into areas. 

I see this now. I was working through the patches.

> Alex can you separate out the RLD?
> If Chris was ok with them all, just repost them as a self-contained set and
> he can ack the cover-letter for the RLD set.

Thank you, this would be a help. The changes are looking good, just minor things
from my point of view.


More information about the devel mailing list