[PATCH 0/3] Fix Missing break in switch Coverity issues

[Gedare Bloom]

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:48 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> On 05/03/2021 19:40, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 12:25 PM Sebastian Huber
> > <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> > <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 05/03/2021 16:27, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> >     > Should we add a macro for this, e.g., "RTEMS_CASE_NO_BREAK" so
> >     that we
> >     > can update them in future if needed for other tools?
> >     I would just pick a name which is understood by GCC, clang, and
> >     Coverity. I guess other tools will understand this or why did you
> >     buy them?
> >
> >
> > Well we didn't pay for any of those but are you wanting a macro or
> > just the comment?
>
> I would just use a comment which is understood by GCC, clang, and
> Coverity. What does Linux use?
>
That's fine, if there is a de facto standard to use, we can go for it.

> --
> embedded brains GmbH
> Herr Sebastian HUBER
> Dornierstr. 4
> 82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
> fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
>
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
> Registernummer: HRB 157899
> Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
> Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
> https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
>