[PATCH 00/26] leon: various fixes and TN0018 errata workaround
daniel at gaisler.com
Sun Mar 7 15:50:56 UTC 2021
On 2020-09-23 17:05, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:34 AM Daniel Hellstrom <daniel at gaisler.com> wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>> Thanks for asking and sorry for dropping the ball on these.
>> The status is that two needs updating (BSD license for new CAN files and
>> the last tn0018 patch needs some redesign based on feedback) and the
>> others are accepted for master. I've sent an response on the tn0018
>> errata patch just now. I would like to push them on the 5 and master
>> branches. To get them onto 5, should I create a ticket for the whole
>> patch set? I will try getting this done next next couple of days, and
>> have a look at you patches too, thanks!
> It would be good to separate them logically to the TN-0018 errata
> fixes vs the CAN/grlib improvements. The concern for pushing them to 5
> is that they touch core sparc files, but since you guys are releasing
> them this way in RCC I'm also comfortable with it. I didn't see any
> changes outside the sparc (since currently grlib is sparc-specific
> too). We'll need those tickets to help us with the dot-release notes.
Sorry for my very late response. There were some more updates on a few
of the patches based on the review comments which has been addressed. I
have now created tickets for all of them which are referenced from the
patches, so I will go ahead and push them for the 5-branch (the posted
patches targeted 5).
However, I will wait with the TN-0018 before I get an acknowledge for
that one. I updated the its ticket with links to the GCC patch that has
now been accepted into upstreams GCC (GCC-10 stable and master). The
TN0018 patch is not enabled if the GCC-patch is not included in the
toolchain, so I believe it should be ok to push, even before RSB is updated?
Next step for me is to add some configurations for the new build system
before I can push them to RTEMS/master.
>> Kind Regards,
>> On 2020-09-18 10:03, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Hallo Daniel,
>>> what are your plans with respect to this patch set?
>>> Please also have a look at:
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel