[PATCH] rtems: rtems_scheduler_get_processor_set() status

[Gedare Bloom]

ok, this is also consistent with rtems_scheduler_ident_by_processor_set()

On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 6:27 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
> In case the processor set is not large enough to contain the processor
> set owned by the scheduler return RTEMS_INVALID_SIZE instead of
> RTEMS_INVALID_NUMBER. This is more in line with other directives since
> the issue is related to the size of an object.
>
> Close #4401.
> ---
>  cpukit/rtems/src/schedulergetprocessorset.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/rtems/src/schedulergetprocessorset.c b/cpukit/rtems/src/schedulergetprocessorset.c
> index 6027ab31a2..71a351528a 100644
> --- a/cpukit/rtems/src/schedulergetprocessorset.c
> +++ b/cpukit/rtems/src/schedulergetprocessorset.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ rtems_status_code rtems_scheduler_get_processor_set(
>    processor_set = _Scheduler_Get_processors( scheduler );
>    status = _Processor_mask_To_cpu_set_t( processor_set, cpusetsize, cpuset );
>    if ( status != PROCESSOR_MASK_COPY_LOSSLESS ) {
> -    return RTEMS_INVALID_NUMBER;
> +    return RTEMS_INVALID_SIZE;
>    }
>
>    return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel