[PATCH] tester: Expand special case for minimum.exe

Chris Johns chrisj at rtems.org
Thu May 27 00:03:15 UTC 2021

On 26/5/21 1:52 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> The minimum.exe test case is expected to fail as an "invalid" test in
> the tester since it is completely stripped down and does not output the
> normal test header and footer. When fatal error detection support was
> added, this caught minimum.exe and started flagging it as "fatal"
> instead of "invalid". The special-case detection of minimum.exe only
> matched on "invalid" results and not "fatal" results and so began
> flagging minimum.exe as an actual failure.>
> This change adds the special-case handling to the "fatal" test state
> handling.

Is this the right solution?

Is minimum.exe suppose to run and not fail? It would seem easy to make a
minimum.exe with nothing in it, ie minimal, that seems to pass. It would make
great marketing material.

What happens if minimum fails? I feel minimum needs to be able to run and not
fail to be a valid minimum.


More information about the devel mailing list