[PATCH 6/7] score: Always validate ticks in _TOD_Validate()

Joel Sherrill joel at rtems.org
Sat Sep 4 04:20:29 UTC 2021


On Fri, Sep 3, 2021, 11:01 PM Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:

> On 3/9/21 11:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > The behaviour with respect to the handling of the ticks member in the
> *_when()
> > directives was inconsistent.  In all *_when() directives the ticks
> member is
> > not used to calculate the watchdog expiration time.  However, the
> > rtems_task_wake_when() directive ignores the ticks member of the time of
> day
> > completely, unlike the rtems_timer_fire_when() and
> > rtems_timer_server_fire_when() directives which check that the ticks are
> valid
> > and then ignore them.
> >
> > This commit changes _TOD_Validate() to unconditionally check the ticks
> value.
> > Ignoring the value would make it more difficult to support the ticks in
> the
> > future.  The watchdog implementation supports a nanoseconds resolution.
> > Checking the ticks in rtems_task_wake_when() may case problems for
> existing
> > applications which could now get an error status due to an invalid ticks
> value.
> >
> > Applications should set the ticks value to zero for future
> compatibility.  This
> > recommendation needs to be added to the documentation.
>
> What happens with existing applications that do not touch this value?
>

Randomly different behaviour.

Before all _when operations occurred on seconds boundaries.  This will
implicitly change that or return an error.

I'm not opposed to the improved granularity but hope it doesn't burn too
many users.

--joel

>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20210903/7ecb2c3d/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list